Ad is loading...
ACVF vs RECS
ACVF vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts ACVF vs RECS
American Conservative Values ETF
Price$39.47
Change-$2.04 (-4.91%)
Volume$100
Net Assets117.8M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$30.46
Change-$1.39 (-4.36%)
Volume$1.15K
Net Assets2.29B
ACVF vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACVF vs. RECS commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACVF is a Hold and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.29B vs. ACVF (118M). ACVF has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: ACVF (-4.913) vs RECS (-8.001). ACVF was incepted earlier than RECS: ACVF (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than ACVF (0.75). RECS has a higher turnover ACVF (12.98) vs ACVF (12.98).
| ACVF | RECS | ACVF / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -4.913 | -8.001 | 61% |
| Net Assets | 118M | 2.29B | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.15 | 500% |
| Turnover | 12.98 | 49.00 | 26% |
| Yield | 0.62 | 0.73 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACVF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ACVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACVF has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACVF jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACVF | 100% | -4.00% | ||
| SNPS - ACVF | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.74% | ||
| LRCX - ACVF | 61% Loosely correlated | -11.60% | ||
| CDNS - ACVF | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| GEV - ACVF | 60% Loosely correlated | -10.02% | ||
| TROW - ACVF | 60% Loosely correlated | -8.18% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -5.15% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -6.05% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.36% | ||
| CR - RECS | 65% Loosely correlated | -7.43% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -11.05% | ||
More | ||||