Ad is loading...
ACVF vs RECS
ACVF vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts ACVF vs RECS
American Conservative Values ETF
Price$45.16
Change-$0.77 (-1.68%)
Volume$6.99K
Net Assets123.01M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.36
Change-$0.62 (-1.72%)
Volume$330.07K
Net Assets1.89B
ACVF vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACVF vs. RECS commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACVF is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.89B vs. ACVF (123M). ACVF has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: ACVF (3.294) vs RECS (2.137). ACVF was incepted earlier than RECS: ACVF (4 years) vs RECS (5 years). RECS has a higher turnover ACVF (9.27) vs ACVF (9.27).
| ACVF | RECS | ACVF / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 3.294 | 2.137 | 154% |
| Net Assets | 123M | 1.89B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 9.27 | 45.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 0.71 | 0.89 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACVF | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ACVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACVF has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACVF jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACVF | 100% | -1.68% | ||
| SNPS - ACVF | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.87% | ||
| LRCX - ACVF | 61% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
| CDNS - ACVF | 61% Loosely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| TROW - ACVF | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| KLAC - ACVF | 60% Loosely correlated | -3.00% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.72% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -4.40% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -1.90% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.88% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.37% | ||
More | ||||