Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWDX vs NRGSX
ACWDX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ACWDX vs NRGSX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth N
Price$18.49
Change-$0.25 (-1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.54M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.09
Change-$0.69 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
ACWDX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWDX vs. NRGSX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWDX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.9B vs. ACWDX (38.5M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ACWDX: NRGSX (0.06) vs ACWDX (0.00). ACWDX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ACWDX (15 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ACWDX (1.24) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ACWDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACWDX: NRGSX (0) vs ACWDX (2000). ACWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.37 vs. NRGSX (-5.89). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : 0.66 vs. ACWDX (-15.74).
| ACWDX | NRGSX | ACWDX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.74 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.74 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.764 | -2.402 | -365% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.5M | 8.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.37 | -5.89 | -176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.68 | 10.52 | 453% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.74 | 0.66 | -2,367% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.53 | 11.35 | 251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement