Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWDX vs NRGSX
ACWDX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ACWDX vs NRGSX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth N
Price$18.40
Change+$0.05 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.62M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.39
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.2B
ACWDX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWDX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWDX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.2B vs. ACWDX (37.6M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ACWDX: NRGSX (0.07) vs ACWDX (0.00). ACWDX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ACWDX (15 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ACWDX (1.24) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ACWDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACWDX: NRGSX (0) vs ACWDX (2000). ACWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.73 vs. NRGSX (-14.54). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -10.73 vs. ACWDX (-22.83).
| ACWDX | NRGSX | ACWDX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.74 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.74 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.500 | -7.544 | -86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6M | 8.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.73 | -14.54 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.43 | -4.05 | -851% |
| Returns for 5 years | -22.83 | -10.73 | 213% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.99 | 3.75 | 640% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers