Ad is loading...
ACWDX vs WCMLX
ACWDX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts ACWDX vs WCMLX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth N
Price$15.79
Change-$0.15 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.25M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.74
Change-$0.06 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.98M
ACWDX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWDX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWDX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WCMLX has more cash in the bank: 42M vs. ACWDX (33.2M). ACWDX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . ACWDX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: ACWDX (15 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than ACWDX (1.24). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. ACWDX (19.00). ACWDX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: ACWDX (2000) vs WCMLX (100000). ACWDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.13 vs. WCMLX (-6.97). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 22.04 vs. ACWDX (-8.20).
| ACWDX | WCMLX | ACWDX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.99 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.86 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.358 | -8.709 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.2M | 42M | 79% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.13 | -6.97 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.00 | 14.99 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.20 | 22.04 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.96 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...