Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWEX vs FAGNX
ACWEX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWEX vs. FAGNX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWEX is a Hold and FAGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. ACWEX (170M). FAGNX pays higher dividends than ACWEX: FAGNX (0.75) vs ACWEX (0.02). ACWEX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: ACWEX (12 years) vs FAGNX (38 years). ACWEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). ACWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 161.00 vs. FAGNX (15.00). ACWEX (0) and FAGNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACWEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.18 vs. FAGNX (4.72). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 216.91 vs. ACWEX (179.02).
| ACWEX | FAGNX | ACWEX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.23 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.23 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.875 | 12.360 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 895M | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.75 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.18 | 4.72 | 343% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.40 | 11.91 | 289% |
| Returns for 5 years | 179.02 | 216.91 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.38 | 79.37 | 154% |