Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWEX vs FAGNX
ACWEX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWEX vs. FAGNX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWEX is a Buy and FAGNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 931M vs. ACWEX (127M). FAGNX pays higher dividends than ACWEX: FAGNX (0.80) vs ACWEX (0.25). ACWEX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: ACWEX (11 years) vs FAGNX (38 years). ACWEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). ACWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 161.00 vs. FAGNX (31.00). ACWEX (0) and FAGNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACWEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.05 vs. FAGNX (-4.55). FAGNX (192.38) and ACWEX (192.20) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ACWEX | FAGNX | ACWEX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.23 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.23 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.585 | 3.543 | 383% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 127M | 931M | 14% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 0.80 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.05 | -4.55 | -353% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.03 | 30.16 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 192.20 | 192.38 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.46 | 52.06 | 178% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement