Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWEX vs FAGNX
ACWEX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWEX vs. FAGNX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWEX is a Hold and FAGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 944M vs. ACWEX (162M). FAGNX pays higher dividends than ACWEX: FAGNX (0.74) vs ACWEX (0.02). ACWEX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: ACWEX (12 years) vs FAGNX (38 years). ACWEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than FAGNX (1.23). ACWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 161.00 vs. FAGNX (15.00). ACWEX (0) and FAGNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACWEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.75 vs. FAGNX (1.93). FAGNX return over 5 years is better than : 251.91 vs. ACWEX (218.76).
| ACWEX | FAGNX | ACWEX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 1.23 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 1.23 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.225 | 5.447 | 408% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162M | 944M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.74 | 3% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.75 | 1.93 | 1,385% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.79 | 19.15 | 270% |
| Returns for 5 years | 218.76 | 251.91 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.61 | 60.94 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement