Ad is loading...
ACWEX vs FAGNX
ACWEX vs FAGNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWEX vs. FAGNX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWEX is a StrongBuy and FAGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAGNX has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. ACWEX (112M). FAGNX pays higher dividends than ACWEX: FAGNX (1.49) vs ACWEX (1.27). ACWEX was incepted earlier than FAGNX: ACWEX (11 years) vs FAGNX (37 years). ACWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 166.00 vs. FAGNX (21.00). ACWEX (0) and FAGNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACWEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.76 vs. FAGNX (18.02). ACWEX return over 5 years is better than : 124.03 vs. FAGNX (92.61).
| ACWEX | FAGNX | ACWEX / FAGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.824 | 8.636 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 112M | 1.12B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 1.49 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.76 | 18.02 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.46 | 56.41 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 124.03 | 92.61 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.80 | 58.69 | 139% |