Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWEX vs FSENX
ACWEX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWEX vs. FSENX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWEX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. ACWEX (162M). FSENX pays higher dividends than ACWEX: FSENX (1.85) vs ACWEX (0.02). ACWEX was incepted earlier than FSENX: ACWEX (12 years) vs FSENX (44 years). ACWEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). ACWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 161.00 vs. FSENX (15.00). ACWEX (0) and FSENX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACWEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.75 vs. FSENX (2.42). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 262.83 vs. ACWEX (218.76).
| ACWEX | FSENX | ACWEX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.65 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.65 | 340% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.225 | 5.889 | 377% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162M | 1.81B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.85 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.75 | 2.42 | 1,105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.79 | 20.84 | 249% |
| Returns for 5 years | 218.76 | 262.83 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 116.61 | 64.65 | 180% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers