Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWEX vs FSENX
ACWEX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWEX vs. FSENX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWEX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.77B vs. ACWEX (170M). FSENX pays higher dividends than ACWEX: FSENX (1.87) vs ACWEX (0.02). ACWEX was incepted earlier than FSENX: ACWEX (12 years) vs FSENX (44 years). ACWEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). ACWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 161.00 vs. FSENX (15.00). ACWEX (0) and FSENX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACWEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.18 vs. FSENX (5.06). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 226.21 vs. ACWEX (179.02).
| ACWEX | FSENX | ACWEX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.65 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.65 | 340% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.875 | 12.707 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 1.77B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.87 | 1% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.18 | 5.06 | 320% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.40 | 13.21 | 260% |
| Returns for 5 years | 179.02 | 226.21 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.38 | 83.24 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement