Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWEX vs FSENX
ACWEX vs FSENX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWEX vs. FSENX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWEX is a Hold and FSENX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSENX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. ACWEX (133M). FSENX pays higher dividends than ACWEX: FSENX (1.93) vs ACWEX (0.25). ACWEX was incepted earlier than FSENX: ACWEX (12 years) vs FSENX (44 years). ACWEX (2.21) is less costly to investors than FSENX (0.65). ACWEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 161.00 vs. FSENX (15.00). ACWEX (0) and FSENX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ACWEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.28 vs. FSENX (-4.44). FSENX return over 5 years is better than : 183.40 vs. ACWEX (168.19).
| ACWEX | FSENX | ACWEX / FSENX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.93 | 0.65 | 297% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.21 | 0.65 | 340% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.465 | 1.919 | 650% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133M | 1.81B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.93 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.28 | -4.44 | -412% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.19 | 22.51 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 168.19 | 183.40 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.09 | 60.22 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement