Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWIX vs NRGSX
ACWIX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts ACWIX vs NRGSX
AMG GW&K Small/Mid Cap Growth I
Price$19.37
Change-$0.26 (-1.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.54M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$63.09
Change-$0.69 (-1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.89B
ACWIX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWIX vs. NRGSX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWIX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.9B vs. ACWIX (38.5M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than ACWIX: NRGSX (0.06) vs ACWIX (0.00). ACWIX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: ACWIX (14 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). ACWIX (1.10) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). ACWIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.00 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACWIX: NRGSX (0) vs ACWIX (100000). ACWIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.59 vs. NRGSX (-5.89). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : 0.66 vs. ACWIX (-13.64).
| ACWIX | NRGSX | ACWIX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.74 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.74 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.874 | -2.402 | -369% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 38.5M | 8.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.06 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.59 | -5.89 | -180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.49 | 10.52 | 461% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.64 | 0.66 | -2,051% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.18 | 11.35 | 292% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement