ACWRF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
21.93M
OLB
Price
$1.66
Change
-$0.14 (-7.78%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACWRF vs OLB

Header iconACWRF vs OLB Comparison
Open Charts ACWRF vs OLBBanner chart's image
Acceleware
Price$0.09
Change+$0.01 (+12.50%)
Volume$130
Capitalization21.93M
OLB Group Inc. (The)
Price$1.66
Change-$0.14 (-7.78%)
Volume$103
Capitalization10.33M
ACWRF vs OLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACWRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACWRF vs. OLB commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWRF is a Hold and OLB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (ACWRF: $0.09 vs. OLB: $1.66)
Brand notoriety: ACWRF and OLB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACWRF: 22% vs. OLB: 47%
Market capitalization -- ACWRF: $21.93M vs. OLB: $10.33M
ACWRF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $21.93M. OLB’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $10.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACWRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOLB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACWRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACWRF is a better buy in the long-term than OLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACWRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACWRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • OLB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACWRF is a better buy in the short-term than OLB.

Price Growth

ACWRF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while OLB (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACWRF is expected to report earnings on May 22, 2025.

OLB is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.19% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACWRF($21.9M) has a higher market cap than OLB($10.3M). ACWRF YTD gains are higher at: 15.867 vs. OLB (-19.807). OLB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -812.6K vs. ACWRF (-2.96M). ACWRF has more cash in the bank: 1M vs. OLB (87.8K). OLB has less debt than ACWRF: OLB (351K) vs ACWRF (1.3M). OLB has higher revenues than ACWRF: OLB (31.6M) vs ACWRF (349K).
ACWRFOLBACWRF / OLB
Capitalization21.9M10.3M213%
EBITDA-2.96M-812.6K365%
Gain YTD15.867-19.807-80%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue349K31.6M1%
Total Cash1M87.8K1,144%
Total Debt1.3M351K370%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACWRF vs OLB: Fundamental Ratings
ACWRF
OLB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
666
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98100
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACWRF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is in the same range as OLB (36). This means that ACWRF’s stock grew similarly to OLB’s over the last 12 months.

ACWRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as OLB (100). This means that ACWRF’s stock grew similarly to OLB’s over the last 12 months.

OLB's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as ACWRF (100). This means that OLB’s stock grew similarly to ACWRF’s over the last 12 months.

ACWRF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as OLB (51). This means that ACWRF’s stock grew similarly to OLB’s over the last 12 months.

ACWRF's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as OLB (100). This means that ACWRF’s stock grew similarly to OLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACWRFOLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACWRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMRN1.770.07
+4.41%
Immuron Limited
CCAP14.330.10
+0.70%
Crescent Capital BDC
GBDC14.770.10
+0.68%
Golub Capital BDC
PHG24.17-0.35
-1.43%
Koninklijke Philips NV
ELA6.08-0.09
-1.46%
Envela Corp

ACWRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACWRF and OKTA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACWRF and OKTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACWRF
1D Price
Change %
ACWRF100%
N/A
OKTA - ACWRF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
ADCOF - ACWRF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AELTF - ACWRF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NCNO - ACWRF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
OLB - ACWRF
6%
Poorly correlated
-7.78%
More

OLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLB has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLB jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OLB
1D Price
Change %
OLB100%
-7.78%
COIN - OLB
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
CLSK - OLB
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
RIOT - OLB
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.25%
BFRG - OLB
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.16%
NCTY - OLB
26%
Poorly correlated
+6.61%
More