| ACWV | CGDG | ACWV / CGDG | |
| Gain YTD | 11.239 | 20.506 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 3.28B | 3.55B | 92% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.47 | 43% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 25.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 2.34 | 1.96 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 2 years | - |
| ACWV | CGDG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 66% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 67% | 5 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RUSC | 30.96 | 0.33 | +1.06% |
| Russell Inv U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF | |||
| JANW | 36.38 | 0.03 | +0.09% |
| AllianzIM US Large Cap Buffer20 Jan ETF | |||
| IYK | 69.20 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
| iShares US Consumer Staples ETF | |||
| MAGG | 20.67 | -0.07 | -0.34% |
| Madison Aggregate Bond ETF | |||
| SMDD | 12.70 | -0.22 | -1.70% |
| ProShares UltraPro Short MidCap400 | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACWV has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACWV jumps, then L could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | 100% | N/A | ||
| L - ACWV | 74% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| LIN - ACWV | 73% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| TRV - ACWV | 69% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| MA - ACWV | 68% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ROP - ACWV | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGDG has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGDG jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGDG | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| BN - CGDG | 77% Closely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| MS - CGDG | 68% Closely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| REXR - CGDG | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| KLAC - CGDG | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| BR - CGDG | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
More | ||||