| ACWV | DIVS | ACWV / DIVS | |
| Gain YTD | 7.694 | 14.372 | 54% |
| Net Assets | 3.38B | 40.9M | 8,269% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.45 | 44% |
| Turnover | 27.00 | 11.69 | 231% |
| Yield | 1.90 | 1.78 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| ACWV | DIVS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 13 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 64% | 28 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 74% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that DIVS and MDLZ have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DIVS and MDLZ's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DIVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIVS | 100% | N/A | ||
| MDLZ - DIVS | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.13% | ||
| ETN - DIVS | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
| CME - DIVS | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.97% | ||
| AFL - DIVS | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| CSCO - DIVS | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
More | ||||