Ad is loading...
ACWV vs GTR
ACWV vs GTR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWV vs. GTR commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWV is a Buy and GTR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACWV has more net assets: 3.73B vs. GTR (53.2M). ACWV has a higher annual dividend yield than GTR: ACWV (4.277) vs GTR (2.034). ACWV was incepted earlier than GTR: ACWV (13 years) vs GTR (3 years). ACWV has a higher turnover GTR (5.00) vs GTR (5.00).
| ACWV | GTR | ACWV / GTR | |
| Gain YTD | 4.277 | 2.034 | 210% |
| Net Assets | 3.73B | 53.2M | 7,008% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 22.00 | 5.00 | 440% |
| Yield | 2.30 | 2.78 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACWV | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SOXS | 18.89 | 1.58 | +9.13% |
| Direxion Daily Semicondct Bear 3X ETF | |||
| TBJL | 19.98 | 0.15 | +0.78% |
| Innovator 20+ Year Tsy Bd Bfr ETF July | |||
| SIXO | 32.99 | -0.30 | -0.89% |
| AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Apr/Oct ETF | |||
| SLX | 62.82 | -1.31 | -2.04% |
| VanEck Steel ETF | |||
| IJK | 89.52 | -2.79 | -3.02% |
| iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | |||
ACWV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACWV has been loosely correlated with BCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACWV jumps, then BCE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| BCE - ACWV | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| L - ACWV | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| ROP - ACWV | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| AWK - ACWV | 55% Loosely correlated | +3.12% | ||
| MA - ACWV | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
More | ||||