Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACWV vs MOTG
ACWV vs MOTG Comparison
Open Charts ACWV vs MOTG
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
Price$118.18
Change-$0.85 (-0.71%)
Volume$642.95K
Net Assets3.39B
VanEck Morningstar Glb Wd Mt ETF
Price$41.65
Change-$0.46 (-1.09%)
Volume$944
Net Assets16.88M
ACWV vs MOTG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACWV vs. MOTG commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACWV is a Hold and MOTG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACWV has more net assets: 3.39B vs. MOTG (16.9M). MOTG has a higher annual dividend yield than ACWV: MOTG (14.919) vs ACWV (8.223). ACWV was incepted earlier than MOTG: ACWV (14 years) vs MOTG (7 years). ACWV (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than MOTG (0.52). MOTG has a higher turnover ACWV (25.00) vs ACWV (25.00).
| ACWV | MOTG | ACWV / MOTG | |
| Gain YTD | 8.223 | 14.919 | 55% |
| Net Assets | 3.39B | 16.9M | 20,083% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.52 | 38% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 73.00 | 34% |
| Yield | 2.15 | 4.92 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ACWV | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ACWV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACWV has been closely correlated with LIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACWV jumps, then LIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACWV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | 100% | -0.71% | ||
| LIN - ACWV | 76% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| GD - ACWV | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| BCE - ACWV | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| WTW - ACWV | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| L - ACWV | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||
MOTG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOTG has been closely correlated with GEHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOTG jumps, then GEHC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOTG | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| GEHC - MOTG | 67% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| NXPI - MOTG | 66% Closely correlated | -2.99% | ||
| DHR - MOTG | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| META - MOTG | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| SHOP - MOTG | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.54% | ||
More | ||||