It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADDDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileASCCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADDDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ASCCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
ADDDF (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а -0.61% price change this week, while ASCCF (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.92%.
Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
ADDDF | ASCCF | ADDDF / ASCCF | |
Capitalization | 36.2B | 5.83B | 621% |
EBITDA | 1.9B | 42.6B | 4% |
Gain YTD | 22.874 | 88.308 | 26% |
P/E Ratio | 138.89 | 28.99 | 479% |
Revenue | 22.5B | 532B | 4% |
Total Cash | 966M | 65B | 1% |
Total Debt | 6.46B | 150B | 4% |
ADDDF | ASCCF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 46 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 42 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASCCF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as ADDDF (84). This means that ASCCF’s stock grew similarly to ADDDF’s over the last 12 months.
ASCCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ADDDF (100). This means that ASCCF’s stock grew significantly faster than ADDDF’s over the last 12 months.
ASCCF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADDDF (76). This means that ASCCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADDDF’s over the last 12 months.
ADDDF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as ASCCF (48). This means that ADDDF’s stock grew similarly to ASCCF’s over the last 12 months.
ASCCF's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as ADDDF (99). This means that ASCCF’s stock grew similarly to ADDDF’s over the last 12 months.
ADDDF | ASCCF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago55% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago58% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | 1 day ago51% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% | 1 day ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago69% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago65% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago41% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADDDF has been closely correlated with ADDYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADDDF jumps, then ADDYY could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADDDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ADDDF | 100% | -2.55% | ||
ADDYY - ADDDF | 72% Closely correlated | -2.25% | ||
PUMSY - ADDDF | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.28% | ||
HNNMY - ADDDF | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
MONRY - ADDDF | 27% Poorly correlated | -4.23% | ||
LEVI - ADDDF | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASCCF and ASCCY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASCCF and ASCCY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASCCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ASCCF | 100% | N/A | ||
ASCCY - ASCCF | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.13% | ||
AREB - ASCCF | 11% Poorly correlated | -4.55% | ||
ADDYY - ASCCF | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.25% | ||
ADDDF - ASCCF | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.55% | ||
BSDGF - ASCCF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |