ADDDF
Price
$209.34
Change
-$7.99 (-3.68%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
38.97B
ASCCF
Price
$27.46
Change
+$1.47 (+5.65%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
18.9B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ADDDF vs ASCCF

Header iconADDDF vs ASCCF Comparison
Open Charts ADDDF vs ASCCFBanner chart's image
adidas AG
Price$209.34
Change-$7.99 (-3.68%)
Volume$74
Capitalization38.97B
Asics
Price$27.46
Change+$1.47 (+5.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization18.9B
ADDDF vs ASCCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ADDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ASCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ADDDF vs. ASCCF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADDDF is a Hold and ASCCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ADDDF: $209.34 vs. ASCCF: $27.47)
Brand notoriety: ADDDF and ASCCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wholesale Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ADDDF: 0% vs. ASCCF: 3%
Market capitalization -- ADDDF: $38.97B vs. ASCCF: $18.9B
ADDDF [@Wholesale Distributors] is valued at $38.97B. ASCCF’s [@Wholesale Distributors] market capitalization is $18.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $102.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $8.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ADDDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileASCCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ADDDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ASCCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASCCF is a better buy in the long-term than ADDDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ADDDF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ASCCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ADDDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ASCCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASCCF is a better buy in the short-term than ADDDF.

Price Growth

ADDDF (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а -2.18% price change this week, while ASCCF (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was +5.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.00%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wholesale Distributors (-0.93% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ADDDF($39B) has a higher market cap than ASCCF($18.9B). ASCCF has higher P/E ratio than ADDDF: ASCCF (38.59) vs ADDDF (26.61). ASCCF YTD gains are higher at: 38.993 vs. ADDDF (-13.099). ASCCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 143B vs. ADDDF (2.99B). ASCCF has more cash in the bank: 125B vs. ADDDF (1.43B). ADDDF has less debt than ASCCF: ADDDF (5.48B) vs ASCCF (111B). ASCCF has higher revenues than ADDDF: ASCCF (739B) vs ADDDF (24.5B).
ADDDFASCCFADDDF / ASCCF
Capitalization39B18.9B206%
EBITDA2.99B143B2%
Gain YTD-13.09938.993-34%
P/E Ratio26.6138.5969%
Revenue24.5B739B3%
Total Cash1.43B125B1%
Total Debt5.48B111B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ADDDF vs ASCCF: Fundamental Ratings
ADDDF
ASCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2937
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1006
SMR RATING
1..100
4099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10040
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ADDDF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASCCF (88). This means that ADDDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASCCF’s over the last 12 months.

ASCCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ADDDF (100). This means that ASCCF’s stock grew significantly faster than ADDDF’s over the last 12 months.

ADDDF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASCCF (99). This means that ADDDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASCCF’s over the last 12 months.

ASCCF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as ADDDF (57). This means that ASCCF’s stock grew similarly to ADDDF’s over the last 12 months.

ASCCF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADDDF (100). This means that ASCCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADDDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ADDDFASCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ADDDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ASCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MYCF25.11-0.01
-0.04%
SPDR SSGA My2026 Corporate Bond ETF
IEI119.30-0.23
-0.19%
iShares 3-7 Year Treasury Bond ETF
YYY11.79-0.06
-0.51%
Amplify High Income ETF
HAPS30.96-0.42
-1.32%
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Sm CapETF
TSL17.65-1.03
-5.51%
GraniteShares 1.25x Long Tsla Daily ETF

ADDDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADDDF has been closely correlated with ADDYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADDDF jumps, then ADDYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ADDDF
1D Price
Change %
ADDDF100%
-3.68%
ADDYY - ADDDF
72%
Closely correlated
-3.43%
PUMSY - ADDDF
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.18%
HNNMY - ADDDF
28%
Poorly correlated
+9.32%
MONRY - ADDDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
LEVI - ADDDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.72%
More

ASCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASCCF and ASCCY have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASCCF and ASCCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASCCF
1D Price
Change %
ASCCF100%
N/A
ASCCY - ASCCF
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
AREB - ASCCF
11%
Poorly correlated
-3.74%
ADDYY - ASCCF
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.43%
ADDDF - ASCCF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.68%
BSDGF - ASCCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.92%
More