ADLRF
Price
$13.39
Change
-$0.12 (-0.89%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
609.48M
FNNCF
Price
$7.68
Change
+$0.10 (+1.32%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
478.44M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ADLRF vs FNNCF

Header iconADLRF vs FNNCF Comparison
Open Charts ADLRF vs FNNCFBanner chart's image
ALARIS EQUITY PARTNERS INCOME TR
Price$13.39
Change-$0.12 (-0.89%)
Volume$785
Capitalization609.48M
Financial 15 Split
Price$7.68
Change+$0.10 (+1.32%)
Volume$900
Capitalization478.44M
ADLRF vs FNNCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ADLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ADLRF vs. FNNCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADLRF is a Hold and FNNCF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ADLRF: $13.39 vs. FNNCF: $7.68)
Brand notoriety: ADLRF and FNNCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ADLRF: 209% vs. FNNCF: 63%
Market capitalization -- ADLRF: $609.48M vs. FNNCF: $478.44M
ADLRF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $609.48M. FNNCF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $478.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ADLRF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNNCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ADLRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNNCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNNCF is a better buy in the long-term than ADLRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ADLRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNNCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ADLRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FNNCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNNCF is a better buy in the short-term than ADLRF.

Price Growth

ADLRF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.89% price change this week, while FNNCF (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ADLRF($609M) has a higher market cap than FNNCF($478M). ADLRF has higher P/E ratio than FNNCF: ADLRF (6.39) vs FNNCF (3.23). FNNCF YTD gains are higher at: 19.626 vs. ADLRF (-1.880). FNNCF has higher revenues than ADLRF: FNNCF (191M) vs ADLRF (167M).
ADLRFFNNCFADLRF / FNNCF
Capitalization609M478M127%
EBITDA140MN/A-
Gain YTD-1.88019.626-10%
P/E Ratio6.393.23198%
Revenue167M191M87%
Total Cash4.41MN/A-
Total Debt153MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNNCF: Fundamental Ratings
FNNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
95
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77
SMR RATING
1..100
23
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ADLRFFNNCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
13%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ADLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGYAX28.83N/A
N/A
Vanguard Global Wellesley Income Admiral
FOSKX73.40N/A
N/A
Fidelity Overseas K
DEQAX14.38N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income - A
HCMQX21.01N/A
N/A
HCM Sector Plus I
NWAJX23.72N/A
N/A
Nationwide Janus Henderson Ovrs Eagle

ADLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ADLRF and UBAAF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ADLRF and UBAAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ADLRF
1D Price
Change %
ADLRF100%
N/A
UBAAF - ADLRF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
FNNCF - ADLRF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
BBXIB - ADLRF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BBUC - ADLRF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
TPG - ADLRF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
More

FNNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNCF and TPG have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNCF and TPG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNCF
1D Price
Change %
FNNCF100%
+1.32%
TPG - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.85%
PAX - FNNCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CG - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
CYMBF - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARES - FNNCF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.52%
More