Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADME vs FFLS
ADME vs FFLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADME vs. FFLS commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADME is a StrongBuy and FFLS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ADME has more net assets: 238M vs. FFLS (40.5M). FFLS has a higher annual dividend yield than ADME: FFLS (11.599) vs ADME (8.280). ADME was incepted earlier than FFLS: ADME (9 years) vs FFLS (2 years). ADME (0.79) has a lower expense ratio than FFLS (1.24). FFLS has a higher turnover ADME (40.00) vs ADME (40.00).
| ADME | FFLS | ADME / FFLS | |
| Gain YTD | 8.280 | 11.599 | 71% |
| Net Assets | 238M | 40.5M | 588% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.24 | 64% |
| Turnover | 40.00 | 88.00 | 45% |
| Yield | 0.44 | 0.16 | 282% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ADME | FFLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 55% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 69% | 14 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
ADME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADME has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADME jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADME | 100% | +0.02% | ||
| MS - ADME | 77% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| BLK - ADME | 76% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| AMZN - ADME | 76% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| MAR - ADME | 75% Closely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| C - ADME | 74% Closely correlated | +0.63% | ||
More | ||||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| META - FFLS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
More | ||||