Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADOZX vs NLSCX
ADOZX vs NLSCX Comparison
Open Charts ADOZX vs NLSCX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities Z
Price$23.54
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.63M
Neuberger Berman Long Short C
Price$18.74
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.79B
ADOZX vs NLSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOZX vs. NLSCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOZX is a Buy and NLSCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSCX has more cash in the bank: 7.79B vs. ADOZX (230M). ADOZX (0.00) and NLSCX (0.00) have matching dividends . ADOZX was incepted earlier than NLSCX: ADOZX (15 years) vs NLSCX (14 years). NLSCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than ADOZX (1.75). ADOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSCX (48.00). NLSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ADOZX: NLSCX (1000) vs ADOZX (500000). ADOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.37 vs. NLSCX (7.96). ADOZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.08 vs. NLSCX (19.46).
| ADOZX | NLSCX | ADOZX / NLSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 2.43 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.675 | 5.822 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 7.79B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.37 | 7.96 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.33 | 17.74 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.08 | 19.46 | 155% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.92 | 44.02 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers