Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADOZX vs NLSIX
ADOZX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts ADOZX vs NLSIX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities Z
Price$23.22
Change+$0.09 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.89M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.01B
ADOZX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOZX vs. NLSIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOZX is a Hold and NLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 8.01B vs. ADOZX (227M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than ADOZX: NLSIX (0.02) vs ADOZX (0.00). ADOZX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: ADOZX (15 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). ADOZX (1.75) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). ADOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSIX (48.00). ADOZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: ADOZX (500000) vs NLSIX (1000000). NLSIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. ADOZX (6.93). NLSIX return over 5 years is better than : 22.56 vs. ADOZX (18.31).
| ADOZX | NLSIX | ADOZX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.32 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.32 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.665 | 6.667 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 8.01B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.93 | 7.67 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.66 | 21.68 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.31 | 22.56 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.84 | 61.34 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement