Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ADOZX vs NLSIX
ADOZX vs NLSIX Comparison
Open Charts ADOZX vs NLSIX
Alger Dynamic Opportunities Z
Price$23.54
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.63M
Neuberger Berman Long Short Instl
Price$20.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.79B
ADOZX vs NLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ADOZX vs. NLSIX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADOZX is a Buy and NLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSIX has more cash in the bank: 7.79B vs. ADOZX (230M). NLSIX pays higher dividends than ADOZX: NLSIX (0.02) vs ADOZX (0.00). ADOZX was incepted earlier than NLSIX: ADOZX (15 years) vs NLSIX (14 years). ADOZX (1.75) is less costly to investors than NLSIX (1.32). ADOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 373.89 vs. NLSIX (48.00). ADOZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLSIX: ADOZX (500000) vs NLSIX (1000000). ADOZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.37 vs. NLSIX (9.13). ADOZX return over 5 years is better than : 30.08 vs. NLSIX (26.76).
| ADOZX | NLSIX | ADOZX / NLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.32 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.32 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.675 | 6.667 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 1000000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 7.79B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.37 | 9.13 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.33 | 22.05 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.08 | 26.76 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.92 | 61.47 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers