Advertisement
ADYYF vs NTDOF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ADYYF is a Hold and NTDOF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ADYYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNTDOF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- ADYYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NTDOF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ADYYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTDOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ADYYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NTDOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
ADYYF (@Computer Communications) experienced а -3.51% price change this week, while NTDOF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was -1.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.98%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.77%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+1.14% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Electronics/Appliances (-2.44% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| ADYYF | NTDOF | ADYYF / NTDOF | |
| Capitalization | 50.6B | 104B | 49% |
| EBITDA | 1.46B | 536B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 7.931 | 53.116 | 15% |
| P/E Ratio | 43.23 | 55.50 | 78% |
| Revenue | 2.43B | 1.4T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 12.4B | 2.02T | 1% |
| Total Debt | 248M | N/A | - |
ADYYF | NTDOF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ADYYF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as NTDOF (88). This means that ADYYF’s stock grew similarly to NTDOF’s over the last 12 months.
NTDOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ADYYF (100). This means that NTDOF’s stock grew significantly faster than ADYYF’s over the last 12 months.
NTDOF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as ADYYF (18). This means that NTDOF’s stock grew similarly to ADYYF’s over the last 12 months.
NTDOF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as ADYYF (63). This means that NTDOF’s stock grew similarly to ADYYF’s over the last 12 months.
NTDOF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ADYYF (63). This means that NTDOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ADYYF’s over the last 12 months.
| ADYYF | NTDOF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 75% | 12 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | N/A |
Advertisement
ADYYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ADYYF has been closely correlated with ADYEY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ADYYF jumps, then ADYEY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ADYYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ADYYF | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| ADYEY - ADYYF | 80% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| MQ - ADYYF | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
| FOUR - ADYYF | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.08% | ||
| CSGS - ADYYF | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| OLO - ADYYF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NTDOF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTDOF has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTDOF jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTDOF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTDOF | 100% | -0.71% | ||
| NTDOY - NTDOF | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| CCOEY - NTDOF | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| BSY - NTDOF | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.11% | ||
| ADYYF - NTDOF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
| YOU - NTDOF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.72% | ||
More | ||||