It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEBZY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileASBRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEBZY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
AEBZY (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а -3.07% price change this week, while ASBRF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was -9.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +1.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.34%.
AEBZY is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
AEBZY | ASBRF | AEBZY / ASBRF | |
Capitalization | 1.98B | 20.1B | 10% |
EBITDA | 19.3B | 388B | 5% |
Gain YTD | 27.818 | -14.566 | -191% |
P/E Ratio | 12.92 | 16.29 | 79% |
Revenue | 101B | 2.57T | 4% |
Total Cash | 24.4B | 51.9B | 47% |
Total Debt | 39.1B | 1.65T | 2% |
AEBZY | ASBRF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASBRF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as AEBZY (48). This means that ASBRF’s stock grew similarly to AEBZY’s over the last 12 months.
AEBZY's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASBRF (100). This means that AEBZY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASBRF’s over the last 12 months.
AEBZY's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as ASBRF (77). This means that AEBZY’s stock grew similarly to ASBRF’s over the last 12 months.
AEBZY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as ASBRF (78). This means that AEBZY’s stock grew similarly to ASBRF’s over the last 12 months.
AEBZY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASBRF (81). This means that AEBZY’s stock grew significantly faster than ASBRF’s over the last 12 months.
AEBZY | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
BSVO | 23.15 | 0.38 | +1.65% |
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | |||
FLKR | 19.28 | 0.19 | +0.99% |
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | |||
ICOP | 28.78 | 0.10 | +0.35% |
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF | |||
SUPL | 41.28 | N/A | N/A |
ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF | |||
FLMI | 24.77 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
Franklin Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AEBZY and ASBRF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEBZY and ASBRF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEBZY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AEBZY | 100% | +1.69% | ||
ASBRF - AEBZY | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BRBMF - AEBZY | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
EAST - AEBZY | 5% Poorly correlated | +11.88% | ||
ADWPF - AEBZY | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SNDL - AEBZY | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ASBRF and BUDFF have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASBRF and BUDFF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASBRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ASBRF | 100% | N/A | ||
BUDFF - ASBRF | 19% Poorly correlated | -1.06% | ||
EAST - ASBRF | 14% Poorly correlated | +11.88% | ||
AEBZY - ASBRF | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.69% | ||
ABEV - ASBRF | 7% Poorly correlated | -0.92% | ||
SNDL - ASBRF | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.02% | ||
More |