Advertisement
AEDFF vs PINE
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDFF is a Buy and PINE is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEDFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePINE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AEDFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PINE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEDFF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PINE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEDFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
- PINE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
AEDFF (@Managed Health Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PINE (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +1.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.24%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.
Reported Earning Dates
PINE is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Managed Health Care (+1.23% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.47% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| AEDFF | PINE | AEDFF / PINE | |
| Capitalization | 3.66B | 205M | 1,783% |
| EBITDA | 292M | 39.5M | 739% |
| Gain YTD | 28.837 | -10.500 | -275% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.29 | 180.75 | 10% |
| Revenue | 363M | 56.3M | 645% |
| Total Cash | 61.8M | 5M | 1,236% |
| Total Debt | 2.58B | 360M | 717% |
| AEDFF | PINE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 13% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 28% | 1 day ago 48% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 26% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 22% | 1 day ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 24% | 1 day ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 47% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 48% |
Advertisement
AEDFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEDFF has been loosely correlated with ARLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AEDFF jumps, then ARLLF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEDFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AEDFF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ARLLF - AEDFF | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CCPPF - AEDFF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DHC - AEDFF | 1% Poorly correlated | +8.01% | ||
| NTST - AEDFF | -4% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
| PINE - AEDFF | -5% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
More | ||||