Ad is loading...
AEDNX vs ARBCX
AEDNX vs ARBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. ARBCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and ARBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARBCX has more cash in the bank: 718M vs. AEDNX (62.8M). AEDNX pays higher dividends than ARBCX: AEDNX (0.19) vs ARBCX (0.00). AEDNX was incepted earlier than ARBCX: AEDNX (15 years) vs ARBCX (13 years). ARBCX (2.53) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.50). AEDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 305.00 vs. ARBCX (230.00). ARBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: ARBCX (2000) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.21 vs. ARBCX (1.62). AEDNX return over 5 years is better than : 24.67 vs. ARBCX (-1.49).
| AEDNX | ARBCX | AEDNX / ARBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.53 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.53 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.841 | 0.845 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 62.8M | 718M | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.21 | 1.62 | 199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.24 | 0.42 | 1,957% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.67 | -1.49 | -1,660% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.23 | -5.46 | -554% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...