Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs ARBCX
AEDNX vs ARBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. ARBCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and ARBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARBCX has more cash in the bank: 719M vs. AEDNX (58.3M). AEDNX pays higher dividends than ARBCX: AEDNX (0.19) vs ARBCX (0.00). AEDNX was incepted earlier than ARBCX: AEDNX (15 years) vs ARBCX (13 years). ARBCX (2.53) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.50). AEDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 305.00 vs. ARBCX (230.00). ARBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: ARBCX (2000) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.66 vs. ARBCX (4.14). AEDNX return over 5 years is better than : 23.55 vs. ARBCX (-1.71).
| AEDNX | ARBCX | AEDNX / ARBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.53 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.53 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.607 | 2.113 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.3M | 719M | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.66 | 4.14 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.59 | 4.68 | 290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.55 | -1.71 | -1,378% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.11 | -4.87 | -659% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement