Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs ARBFX
AEDNX vs ARBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. ARBFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and ARBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARBFX has more cash in the bank: 732M vs. AEDNX (59.7M). ARBFX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: ARBFX (0.43) vs AEDNX (0.19). AEDNX was incepted earlier than ARBFX: AEDNX (15 years) vs ARBFX (25 years). ARBFX (1.78) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.50). AEDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 305.00 vs. ARBFX (230.00). ARBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: ARBFX (2000) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.29 vs. ARBFX (5.93). AEDNX return over 5 years is better than : 24.33 vs. ARBFX (4.04).
| AEDNX | ARBFX | AEDNX / ARBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 1.78 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.78 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.635 | 4.884 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2000 | 5,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.7M | 732M | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 0.43 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.29 | 5.93 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.66 | 8.84 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.33 | 4.04 | 602% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.35 | 8.64 | 490% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement