Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs CMRAX
AEDNX vs CMRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. CMRAX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and CMRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEDNX has more cash in the bank: 59.4M vs. CMRAX (2.82M). CMRAX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: CMRAX (1.06) vs AEDNX (0.19). AEDNX was incepted earlier than CMRAX: AEDNX (15 years) vs CMRAX (2 years). CMRAX (12.56) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.50). AEDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 195.00 vs. CMRAX (136.00). CMRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: CMRAX (2500) vs AEDNX (100000). CMRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.02 vs. AEDNX (5.99).
| AEDNX | CMRAX | AEDNX / CMRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.16 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 12.56 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.224 | 8.621 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.4M | 2.82M | 2,108% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 1.06 | 18% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.99 | 8.02 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.51 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.45 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.81 | -55.13 | -90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement