Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs DNMDX
AEDNX vs DNMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. DNMDX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and DNMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DNMDX has more cash in the bank: 250M vs. AEDNX (59.7M). DNMDX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: DNMDX (7.60) vs AEDNX (0.19). AEDNX was incepted earlier than DNMDX: AEDNX (15 years) vs DNMDX (17 years). DNMDX (2.38) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.50). AEDNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 305.00 vs. DNMDX (209.00). AEDNX (100000) and DNMDX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. DNMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.46 vs. AEDNX (6.20). AEDNX return over 5 years is better than : 24.33 vs. DNMDX (9.88).
| AEDNX | DNMDX | AEDNX / DNMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 2.38 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 2.38 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.635 | 5.468 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.7M | 250M | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 7.60 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.20 | 9.46 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.45 | 14.21 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.33 | 9.88 | 246% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.20 | -3.32 | -1,273% |