Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs HMECX
AEDNX vs HMECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. HMECX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and HMECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMECX has more cash in the bank: 1.13B vs. AEDNX (59.6M). HMECX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: HMECX (4.31) vs AEDNX (0.19). AEDNX was incepted earlier than HMECX: AEDNX (15 years) vs HMECX (9 years). HMECX (3.39) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.50). HMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 556.00 vs. AEDNX (195.00). HMECX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: HMECX (2500) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. HMECX (4.81). AEDNX return over 5 years is better than : 22.68 vs. HMECX (12.82).
| AEDNX | HMECX | AEDNX / HMECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 3.14 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 3.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.476 | 4.117 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 59.6M | 1.13B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 4.31 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.33 | 4.81 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.15 | 13.72 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.68 | 12.82 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement