Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs HMECX
AEDNX vs HMECX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. HMECX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and HMECX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMECX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. AEDNX (58.4M). HMECX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: HMECX (4.32) vs AEDNX (0.19). AEDNX was incepted earlier than HMECX: AEDNX (15 years) vs HMECX (9 years). HMECX (3.39) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.50). HMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 556.00 vs. AEDNX (305.00). HMECX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: HMECX (2500) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.75 vs. HMECX (4.80). AEDNX return over 5 years is better than : 23.55 vs. HMECX (14.55).
| AEDNX | HMECX | AEDNX / HMECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 3.14 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 3.39 | 44% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.607 | 1.789 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.4M | 1.09B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 4.32 | 5% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.75 | 4.80 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.11 | 12.37 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.55 | 14.55 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers