Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEDNX vs HMECX
AEDNX vs HMECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEDNX vs. HMECX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEDNX is a Hold and HMECX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMECX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. AEDNX (58.2M). HMECX pays higher dividends than AEDNX: HMECX (4.29) vs AEDNX (0.19). AEDNX was incepted earlier than HMECX: AEDNX (15 years) vs HMECX (9 years). HMECX (3.39) is less costly to investors than AEDNX (1.62). HMECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 406.00 vs. AEDNX (195.00). HMECX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEDNX: HMECX (2500) vs AEDNX (100000). AEDNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.99 vs. HMECX (5.47). AEDNX return over 5 years is better than : 21.67 vs. HMECX (12.23).
| AEDNX | HMECX | AEDNX / HMECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.46 | 3.14 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.62 | 3.39 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.317 | 4.612 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 2500 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.2M | 1.17B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.19 | 4.29 | 4% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.99 | 5.47 | 146% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.18 | 13.48 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.67 | 12.23 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement