AEF | EEM | AEF / EEM | |
Gain YTD | 5.357 | 7.604 | 70% |
Net Assets | 241M | 16.6B | 1% |
Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.72 | 167% |
Turnover | 42.00 | 13.00 | 323% |
Yield | 0.63 | 2.32 | 27% |
Fund Existence | 36 years | 22 years | - |
AEF | EEM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago86% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago85% | 18 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AEF and SCCO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEF and SCCO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AEF | 100% | +2.85% | ||
SCCO - AEF | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.12% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EEM | 100% | +2.86% | ||
BABA - EEM | 76% Closely correlated | +4.34% | ||
JD - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +4.93% | ||
KC - EEM | 70% Closely correlated | +9.02% | ||
BILI - EEM | 69% Closely correlated | +3.25% | ||
BIDU - EEM | 67% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
More |