AEF | IEMG | AEF / IEMG | |
Gain YTD | 12.698 | 12.428 | 102% |
Net Assets | 262M | 90.5B | 0% |
Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.09 | 1,333% |
Turnover | 42.00 | 7.00 | 600% |
Yield | 0.19 | 2.95 | 6% |
Fund Existence | 36 years | 13 years | - |
AEF | IEMG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago86% | 19 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% | 3 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago78% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AEF and SCCO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEF and SCCO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AEF | 100% | -1.90% | ||
SCCO - AEF | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.23% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEMG has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IEMG jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG | 100% | -1.61% | ||
BABA - IEMG | 75% Closely correlated | -3.22% | ||
JD - IEMG | 69% Closely correlated | -2.53% | ||
BILI - IEMG | 68% Closely correlated | -3.47% | ||
BIDU - IEMG | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
BZUN - IEMG | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
More |