AEF | IEMG | AEF / IEMG | |
Gain YTD | 20.624 | 17.913 | 115% |
Net Assets | 271M | 98.4B | 0% |
Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.09 | 1,333% |
Turnover | 42.00 | 7.00 | 600% |
Yield | 0.12 | 3.13 | 4% |
Fund Existence | 36 years | 13 years | - |
AEF | IEMG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago75% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago88% | 1 day ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago85% | 28 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago79% | 1 day ago85% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AEF and SCCO have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEF and SCCO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AEF | 100% | +0.17% | ||
SCCO - AEF | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.91% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEMG has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IEMG jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG | 100% | +0.40% | ||
BABA - IEMG | 75% Closely correlated | -1.06% | ||
JD - IEMG | 69% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
BILI - IEMG | 68% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
BIDU - IEMG | 66% Loosely correlated | -7.48% | ||
BZUN - IEMG | 61% Loosely correlated | +8.89% | ||
More |