It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBBSEY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BBSEY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AEG (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -1.53% price change this week, while BBSEY (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -2.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.45%.
AEG is expected to report earnings on Nov 15, 2024.
BBSEY is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2025.
A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
AEG | BBSEY | AEG / BBSEY | |
Capitalization | 10.8B | 13.1B | 82% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 22.219 | -6.599 | -337% |
P/E Ratio | 13.16 | 9.06 | 145% |
Revenue | 17.8B | 4.89B | 364% |
Total Cash | 57B | 3.51M | 1,625,784% |
Total Debt | 5.4B | N/A | - |
AEG | BBSEY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 72 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AEG's Valuation (11) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBSEY (60) in the null industry. This means that AEG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBSEY’s over the last 12 months.
AEG's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for BBSEY (94) in the null industry. This means that AEG’s stock grew significantly faster than BBSEY’s over the last 12 months.
BBSEY's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEG (87) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that BBSEY’s stock grew significantly faster than AEG’s over the last 12 months.
AEG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as BBSEY (72) in the null industry. This means that AEG’s stock grew similarly to BBSEY’s over the last 12 months.
AEG's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for BBSEY (73) in the null industry. This means that AEG’s stock grew significantly faster than BBSEY’s over the last 12 months.
AEG | BBSEY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago70% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago62% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago63% | 12 days ago67% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago64% | 5 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago59% | 3 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago72% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BBSEY and AVVIY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BBSEY and AVVIY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBSEY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BBSEY | 100% | -0.17% | ||
AVVIY - BBSEY | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.56% | ||
ALIZY - BBSEY | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
AEG - BBSEY | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.74% | ||
SAXPY - BBSEY | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
SLF - BBSEY | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.34% | ||
More |