Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs BINIX
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs BINIX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$65.28
Change-$0.08 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.77B
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$34.20
Change+$0.11 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets371.85M
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. BINIX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and BINIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. BINIX (372M). BINIX (0.66) and AEGFX (0.63) have matching dividends . AEGFX was incepted earlier than BINIX: AEGFX (25 years) vs BINIX (16 years). BINIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: AEGFX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.56 vs. AEGFX (10.92). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 26.86 vs. AEGFX (15.19).
| AEGFX | BINIX | AEGFX / BINIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.04 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.110 | 27.411 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 372M | 37,366% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.66 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.92 | 20.56 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.48 | 62.08 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.19 | 26.86 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.81 | 95.66 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement