Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs BINIX
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs BINIX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$59.10
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.41B
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$31.18
Change-$0.15 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.55M
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. BINIX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and BINIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. BINIX (337M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than BINIX: AEGFX (1.00) vs BINIX (0.83). AEGFX was incepted earlier than BINIX: AEGFX (24 years) vs BINIX (16 years). BINIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: AEGFX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.48 vs. AEGFX (4.02). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 31.04 vs. AEGFX (17.32).
| AEGFX | BINIX | AEGFX / BINIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.04 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.550 | 16.729 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 337M | 39,466% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.83 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.02 | 18.48 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.17 | 28.48 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.32 | 31.04 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.06 | 65.72 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement