Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs BINIX
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs BINIX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$59.92
Change+$0.13 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.65B
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$31.43
Change+$0.13 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets351.68M
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. BINIX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and BINIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. BINIX (352M). BINIX pays higher dividends than AEGFX: BINIX (0.79) vs AEGFX (0.67). AEGFX was incepted earlier than BINIX: AEGFX (24 years) vs BINIX (16 years). BINIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: AEGFX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.01 vs. AEGFX (1.95). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 22.24 vs. AEGFX (13.14).
| AEGFX | BINIX | AEGFX / BINIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.04 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.084 | 16.617 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 352M | 37,784% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.79 | 85% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.95 | 14.01 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.15 | 34.54 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.14 | 22.24 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.70 | 67.16 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement