Ad is loading...
AEGFX vs BINIX
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs BINIX
American Funds Europacific Growth F1
Price$53.80
Change-$1.56 (-2.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets125.35B
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$26.63
Change-$0.70 (-2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.77M
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. BINIX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and BINIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 125B vs. BINIX (324M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than BINIX: AEGFX (1.09) vs BINIX (1.02). AEGFX was incepted earlier than BINIX: AEGFX (24 years) vs BINIX (16 years). BINIX (0.98) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). BINIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.76 vs. AEGFX (30.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: AEGFX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.84 vs. AEGFX (-6.89). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 51.78 vs. AEGFX (36.50).
| AEGFX | BINIX | AEGFX / BINIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.95 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.98 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.636 | 1.826 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 125B | 324M | 38,580% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.02 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.89 | 4.84 | -142% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.50 | -6.18 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.50 | 51.78 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.86 | 50.32 | 22% |