Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs BINIX
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs BINIX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$61.86
Change+$0.32 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.49B
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$32.19
Change+$0.10 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets344.99M
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. BINIX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and BINIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. BINIX (345M). BINIX pays higher dividends than AEGFX: BINIX (0.78) vs AEGFX (0.66). AEGFX was incepted earlier than BINIX: AEGFX (25 years) vs BINIX (16 years). BINIX (1.04) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: AEGFX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.13 vs. AEGFX (8.61). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 23.37 vs. AEGFX (11.61).
| AEGFX | BINIX | AEGFX / BINIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.96 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.04 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.713 | 20.976 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 345M | 38,551% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.78 | 84% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.61 | 20.13 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.28 | 41.55 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.61 | 23.37 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.96 | 89.94 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers