Ad is loading...
AEGFX vs BINIX
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs BINIX
American Funds Europacific Growth F1
Price$57.55
Change+$1.27 (+2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets129.02B
Baron International Growth Institutional
Price$29.20
Change+$0.50 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.44M
AEGFX vs BINIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. BINIX commentary
May 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Buy and BINIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 129B vs. BINIX (313M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than BINIX: AEGFX (1.06) vs BINIX (0.96). AEGFX was incepted earlier than BINIX: AEGFX (24 years) vs BINIX (16 years). BINIX (0.98) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). AEGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BINIX (24.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BINIX: AEGFX (250) vs BINIX (1000000). BINIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.66 vs. AEGFX (1.55). BINIX return over 5 years is better than : 42.95 vs. AEGFX (30.19).
| AEGFX | BINIX | AEGFX / BINIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.95 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.98 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.651 | 8.793 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 129B | 313M | 41,214% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 0.96 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.55 | 13.66 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.77 | 11.47 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.19 | 42.95 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.76 | 56.50 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers