Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs MNOZX
AEGFX vs MNOZX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs MNOZX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$65.19
Change+$0.42 (+0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$36.71
Change+$0.14 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets347.18M
AEGFX vs MNOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. MNOZX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and MNOZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. MNOZX (347M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than AEGFX: MNOZX (1.20) vs AEGFX (0.63). AEGFX was incepted earlier than MNOZX: AEGFX (25 years) vs MNOZX (7 years). AEGFX (0.86) is less costly to investors than MNOZX (0.71). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. AEGFX (35.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: AEGFX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). AEGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.02 vs. MNOZX (8.16). MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 35.92 vs. AEGFX (14.29).
| AEGFX | MNOZX | AEGFX / MNOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.66 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.71 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.942 | 13.783 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 347M | 39,769% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.20 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.02 | 8.16 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.47 | 57.01 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.29 | 35.92 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement