Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs MNOZX
AEGFX vs MNOZX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs MNOZX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$63.63
Change-$0.13 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.84B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series Z
Price$37.06
Change-$0.04 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets367.88M
AEGFX vs MNOZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. MNOZX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and MNOZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. MNOZX (368M). MNOZX pays higher dividends than AEGFX: MNOZX (1.21) vs AEGFX (0.66). AEGFX was incepted earlier than MNOZX: AEGFX (25 years) vs MNOZX (7 years). AEGFX (0.86) is less costly to investors than MNOZX (0.71). MNOZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. AEGFX (35.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOZX: AEGFX (250) vs MNOZX (1000000). AEGFX (10.13) and MNOZX (9.85) have marching annual gain over last year. MNOZX return over 5 years is better than : 38.27 vs. AEGFX (13.89).
| AEGFX | MNOZX | AEGFX / MNOZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.66 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.71 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.024 | 15.432 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 368M | 37,228% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 1.21 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.13 | 9.85 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.31 | 49.85 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.89 | 38.27 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers