Ad is loading...
AEGFX vs NBNAX
AEGFX vs NBNAX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs NBNAX
American Funds Europacific Growth F1
Price$51.49
Change+$2.45 (+5.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.84B
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$13.15
Change+$0.87 (+7.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.93M
AEGFX vs NBNAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. NBNAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and NBNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. NBNAX (184M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than NBNAX: AEGFX (1.09) vs NBNAX (0.88). AEGFX was incepted earlier than NBNAX: AEGFX (24 years) vs NBNAX (17 years). NBNAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEGFX (30.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: AEGFX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). NBNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.39 vs. AEGFX (-15.20). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 17.47 vs. AEGFX (13.88).
| AEGFX | NBNAX | AEGFX / NBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.16 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.34 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.268 | -4.954 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 111B | 184M | 60,326% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.88 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.20 | -7.39 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | -9.58 | -6.02 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.88 | 17.47 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.38 | 13.78 | -3% |