Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs NBNAX
AEGFX vs NBNAX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs NBNAX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$63.63
Change-$0.13 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.84B
Neuberger Berman International Sel A
Price$15.21
Change-$0.05 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.74M
AEGFX vs NBNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. NBNAX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and NBNAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. NBNAX (250M). NBNAX pays higher dividends than AEGFX: NBNAX (0.80) vs AEGFX (0.66). AEGFX was incepted earlier than NBNAX: AEGFX (25 years) vs NBNAX (18 years). NBNAX (1.34) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). NBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEGFX (35.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNAX: AEGFX (250) vs NBNAX (1000). AEGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.13 vs. NBNAX (7.91). NBNAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.16 vs. AEGFX (13.89).
| AEGFX | NBNAX | AEGFX / NBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.16 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.34 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.024 | 18.111 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 250M | 54,800% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.80 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.13 | 7.91 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.31 | 39.92 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.89 | 15.16 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.71 | 56.54 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement