Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs NBNCX
AEGFX vs NBNCX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs NBNCX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$61.86
Change+$0.32 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.86B
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.62
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.32M
AEGFX vs NBNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. NBNCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and NBNCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. NBNCX (245M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: AEGFX (0.66) vs NBNCX (0.06). AEGFX was incepted earlier than NBNCX: AEGFX (24 years) vs NBNCX (18 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEGFX (35.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: AEGFX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). AEGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.61 vs. NBNCX (6.41). AEGFX (11.61) and NBNCX (11.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AEGFX | NBNCX | AEGFX / NBNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.91 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.13 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.713 | 16.124 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 245M | 54,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.06 | 1,013% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.61 | 6.41 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.28 | 34.52 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.61 | 11.31 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.96 | 44.36 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement