Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs NBNCX
AEGFX vs NBNCX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs NBNCX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$64.92
Change-$0.27 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.70
Change-$0.07 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.01M
AEGFX vs NBNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. NBNCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and NBNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. NBNCX (248M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: AEGFX (0.63) vs NBNCX (0.06). AEGFX was incepted earlier than NBNCX: AEGFX (25 years) vs NBNCX (18 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEGFX (35.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: AEGFX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). AEGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. NBNCX (7.81). AEGFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.29 vs. NBNCX (9.73).
| AEGFX | NBNCX | AEGFX / NBNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.91 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.13 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.942 | 17.315 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 248M | 55,645% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.06 | 976% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.51 | 7.81 | 147% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.33 | 41.44 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.29 | 9.73 | 147% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.04 | 42.27 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement