Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEGFX vs NBNCX
AEGFX vs NBNCX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs NBNCX
American Funds EUPAC F1
Price$63.34
Change-$0.52 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.46B
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.41
Change-$0.22 (-1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.08M
AEGFX vs NBNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. NBNCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and NBNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. NBNCX (246M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: AEGFX (0.66) vs NBNCX (0.06). AEGFX was incepted earlier than NBNCX: AEGFX (25 years) vs NBNCX (18 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEGFX (35.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: AEGFX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). AEGFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.65 vs. NBNCX (5.63). AEGFX return over 5 years is better than : 16.07 vs. NBNCX (13.00).
| AEGFX | NBNCX | AEGFX / NBNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.91 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.13 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.481 | 16.203 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 246M | 55,285% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.66 | 0.06 | 1,013% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | 5.63 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.18 | 46.06 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.07 | 13.00 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.81 | 50.28 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement