Ad is loading...
AEGFX vs NBNCX
AEGFX vs NBNCX Comparison
Open Charts AEGFX vs NBNCX
American Funds Europacific Growth F1
Price$52.46
Change+$0.88 (+1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.48B
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$12.93
Change+$0.34 (+2.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.57M
AEGFX vs NBNCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEGFX vs. NBNCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEGFX is a Hold and NBNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEGFX has more cash in the bank: 116B vs. NBNCX (184M). AEGFX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: AEGFX (1.09) vs NBNCX (0.07). AEGFX was incepted earlier than NBNCX: AEGFX (24 years) vs NBNCX (17 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than AEGFX (0.86). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEGFX (30.00). AEGFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: AEGFX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). NBNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.26 vs. AEGFX (-8.55). AEGFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.82 vs. NBNCX (18.81).
| AEGFX | NBNCX | AEGFX / NBNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 1.91 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 2.13 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.871 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116B | 184M | 63,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.07 | 1,532% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.55 | -2.26 | 379% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.25 | -0.72 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.82 | 18.81 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.67 | 12.37 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...