It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEGXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNCAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEGXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNCAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
AEGXF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -3.22% price change this week, while SNCAF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -1.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.80%.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
AEGXF | SNCAF | AEGXF / SNCAF | |
Capitalization | 1.16B | 9.4B | 12% |
EBITDA | 21.8M | 818M | 3% |
Gain YTD | 89.308 | 60.031 | 149% |
P/E Ratio | 6.83 | 40.01 | 17% |
Revenue | 4.11B | 9.36B | 44% |
Total Cash | 506M | 822M | 62% |
Total Debt | 314M | 2.43B | 13% |
AEGXF | SNCAF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 27 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AEGXF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNCAF (85). This means that AEGXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNCAF’s over the last 12 months.
SNCAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEGXF (59). This means that SNCAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEGXF’s over the last 12 months.
SNCAF's SMR Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as AEGXF (91). This means that SNCAF’s stock grew similarly to AEGXF’s over the last 12 months.
AEGXF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SNCAF (39). This means that AEGXF’s stock grew similarly to SNCAF’s over the last 12 months.
SNCAF's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEGXF (98). This means that SNCAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEGXF’s over the last 12 months.
AEGXF | SNCAF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 7 days ago50% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago50% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago67% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago59% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago63% | 6 days ago71% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 8 days ago63% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago62% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago64% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
GSIOX | 29.19 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts Instl | |||
PMYTX | 44.42 | -0.22 | -0.49% |
Putnam Core Equity Fund R6 | |||
FDVAX | 25.50 | -0.15 | -0.58% |
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl A | |||
IUAAX | 42.81 | -0.31 | -0.72% |
VY® Invesco Equity and Income A | |||
RYESX | 208.73 | -2.56 | -1.21% |
Rydex Energy Services A |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AEGXF and KLRGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEGXF and KLRGF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AEGXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AEGXF | 100% | -2.21% | ||
KLRGF - AEGXF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ACM - AEGXF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
APG - AEGXF | 24% Poorly correlated | +3.25% | ||
PRIM - AEGXF | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
BIRDF - AEGXF | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.54% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNCAF and ACM have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNCAF and ACM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNCAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SNCAF | 100% | -2.08% | ||
ACM - SNCAF | 26% Poorly correlated | -3.14% | ||
STN - SNCAF | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
APG - SNCAF | 23% Poorly correlated | -4.46% | ||
EME - SNCAF | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.62% | ||
AEGXF - SNCAF | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.26% | ||
More |