Advertisement
AEM vs CDE
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) vs. Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- AEM reported record quarterly net income in Q1 2026, bolstering its position as a stable gold producer amid recent market volatility.
- CDE completed a significant debt exchange following its New Gold acquisition, raising production guidance and driving strong one-year gains.
- AEM exhibits lower volatility (beta of 0.57) compared to CDE's higher beta of 1.33, appealing to risk-averse investors.
- Both stocks benefit from precious metals strength, but AEM's larger market cap ($92B) provides greater scale than CDE's ($18B).
- CDE delivered superior one-year returns (over 226%), while AEM shows steadier year-to-date performance (8.5%).
- Recent expansions highlight growth potential, with AEM advancing in Finland and CDE integrating new assets.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits AEM, a leading gold miner, against CDE, a diversified precious metals producer, in the context of recent precious metals market dynamics. Both companies operate in North America and beyond, capitalizing on gold and silver demand amid economic uncertainty and inflation concerns. Traders seeking momentum plays or investors eyeing long-term sector exposure will find value in analyzing their relative performance, growth catalysts, and risk profiles. This head-to-head review draws on recent financial results and market positioning to illuminate opportunities in the mining sector.
AEM Overview and Recent Performance
Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) is a prominent gold producer with operations across Canada, Australia, Finland, and Mexico. The company focuses on low-cost production and reserve expansion. In recent weeks, AEM beat Q1 2026 earnings expectations, posting record quarterly net income driven by higher gold output and favorable metal prices. Strategic moves, including Finland belt consolidations via acquisitions, have enhanced its pipeline. Despite a post-earnings pullback amid broader market pressures, the stock has maintained resilience, trading around $184 with a year-to-date gain of about 8.5%. Sentiment remains positive due to strong free cash flow ($4.3B TTM) and a robust balance sheet, supporting dividends and growth investments.
CDE Overview and Recent Performance
Coeur Mining, Inc. (CDE) is a U.S.-based gold and silver producer with assets in the United States, Canada, and Mexico, emphasizing polymetallic operations like Palmarejo and Rochester. Recent market activity has spotlighted its transformative New Gold acquisition, followed by a $386 million note exchange that streamlined debt and raised 2026 production guidance. These developments have fueled momentum, with shares around $17.65 reflecting explosive one-year returns exceeding 226%, though year-to-date up only 1%. Higher volatility reflects operational leverage to silver prices and integration risks, yet improved cash flow and asset optimization have lifted investor confidence in recent weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. These bots deliver real-time signals for copy trading, boasting impressive stats: annualized returns up to 163%, win rates from 51% to 88%, profit factors reaching 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios as high as 17. Examples include semiconductor bots with 97% returns on tickers like LRCX and NVDA, volatility plays at 163% on USAR/SMR/CIFR, and a gold/copper miners bot with low drawdowns. Tailored for current conditions like sector rotations and volatility, they suit swing traders to long-term investors. Explore Trending AI Robots to identify bots aligning with your portfolio.
Head-to-Head Comparison
AEM and CDE both thrive in precious metals but diverge in scale and focus. AEM’s pure-play gold model emphasizes operational efficiency and organic growth, contrasting CDE’s diversified gold-silver-zinc exposure via mergers and acquisitions (M&A). Recent momentum favors CDE’s post-acquisition surge, yet AEM leads in stability with superior profit margins (39%) and return on equity (22%). Risk factors include CDE’s elevated debt/equity (11%) and beta, exposing it more to commodity swings, while AEM’s low leverage offers downside protection. Sector tailwinds like gold prices support both, but AEM edges in market sentiment for its consistent execution.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward AEM with higher probability in the near term, citing its trend consistency, record earnings stability, and lower volatility amid uncertain markets. While CDE offers compelling upside from recent catalysts like production growth, its higher risk profile tempers enthusiasm. Investors may favor AEM for relative positioning, though monitoring precious metals trends remains key.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Hold and CDE is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AEM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCDE’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CDE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDE’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CDE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +13.45% price change this week, while CDE (@Precious Metals) price change was +13.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +12.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
CDE is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (+12.99% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| AEM | CDE | AEM / CDE | |
| Capitalization | 87.5B | 18.1B | 483% |
| EBITDA | 9.74B | 1.31B | 743% |
| Gain YTD | 2.476 | -1.572 | -157% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.29 | 14.14 | 115% |
| Revenue | 13.5B | 2.57B | 526% |
| Total Cash | 3.12B | 843M | 370% |
| Total Debt | 319M | 773M | 41% |
AEM | CDE | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 87 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 13 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CDE's Valuation (46) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (93) in the null industry. This means that CDE’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CDE (62) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CDE (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.
CDE's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as AEM (53) in the null industry. This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.
AEM's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as CDE (94) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.
| AEM | CDE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 70% | 8 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 82% |
Advertisement