This comparison examines CDE (Coeur Mining) and PAAS (Pan American Silver), two established players in the silver and gold mining sector. Investors and traders focused on precious metals exposure often evaluate these names together due to overlapping commodity sensitivities and operational footprints across North and South America. The analysis highlights differences in scale, recent operational updates, balance sheet strength, and market positioning within the current environment of fluctuating metal prices and shifting macroeconomic conditions. This review is relevant for portfolio managers seeking commodity-linked equities, sector specialists monitoring relative value, and active traders assessing momentum in basic materials.
Coeur Mining, Inc. is a precious metals producer with operations focused on gold and silver extraction in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The company has emphasized expansion through acquisitions and operational improvements in recent periods. In recent market activity, CDE shares responded positively to reported record quarterly revenue exceeding $1.1 billion, alongside the introduction of a dividend policy and a share repurchase authorization. These developments occurred amid higher realized metal prices and production metrics that included strong gold and silver output. Sentiment has been influenced by execution on ramp-ups at newer assets, cost management, and broader strength in gold prices, contributing to volatility and upward price movement in recent weeks.
Pan American Silver Corp. is one of the larger primary silver producers, with diversified operations across the Americas generating both silver and gold. The company maintains significant reserves and has pursued growth through acquisitions and optimization of existing mines. In recent market activity, PAAS benefited from rising silver prices and prior-quarter results that delivered record cash balances and enhanced shareholder return frameworks. Upcoming second-quarter results are anticipated shortly, following a period of steady production aligned with guidance. Performance has reflected commodity price support, operational consistency, and liquidity strength, with share price movements tracking broader sector gains in recent weeks.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only those demonstrating the strongest suitability for prevailing market conditions, including trend consistency and risk-adjusted metrics, earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of statistics, such as win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles, allowing users to match styles to individual preferences. The platform provides transparent performance data to support informed selection. Explore the full curated list at Trending AI Robots.
CDE and PAAS share core exposure to silver and gold prices but differ in scale and capital allocation. PAAS operates with larger attributable production volumes and a more established balance sheet featuring substantial cash reserves, supporting greater financial flexibility. In contrast, CDE has highlighted recent catalysts including record revenue, a first dividend in decades, and repurchase initiatives that may appeal to income-oriented or value-focused participants. Both face similar risks from commodity volatility, mining costs, and jurisdictional factors in the Americas. Recent momentum for each has aligned with metal price rallies, though CDE exhibited sharper reactions to its earnings release while PAAS emphasized liquidity and production stability. Market sentiment for the pair remains closely linked, with relative outperformance often determined by company-specific operational updates versus broader macro drivers.
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings delivery, capital return signals, and trend consistency amid commodity strength, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to CDE. This assessment reflects the stock’s response to record revenue figures and new shareholder return measures, which may support more sustained momentum relative to peers in the near term, though outcomes remain contingent on continued metal price stability and operational execution.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CDE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CDE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CDE (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.76% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +34.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -22.48%.
CDE is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| CDE | PAAS | CDE / PAAS | |
| Capitalization | 21.7B | 22B | 99% |
| EBITDA | 1.31B | 2.46B | 53% |
| Gain YTD | 18.641 | 3.006 | 620% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.76 | 15.64 | 114% |
| Revenue | 2.57B | 4.31B | 60% |
| Total Cash | 843M | 1.37B | 61% |
| Total Debt | 773M | 845M | 91% |
CDE | PAAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 46 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 46 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PAAS's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDE (53). This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDE’s over the last 12 months.
CDE's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (46). This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's SMR Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CDE (63). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.
CDE's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (43). This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.
PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CDE (90). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.
| CDE | PAAS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDE has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDE jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAAS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAAS | 100% | -3.68% | ||
| WPM - PAAS | 90% Closely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| FSM - PAAS | 88% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| KGC - PAAS | 88% Closely correlated | -3.81% | ||
| AEM - PAAS | 87% Closely correlated | -4.27% | ||
| IAG - PAAS | 87% Closely correlated | -4.41% | ||
More | ||||