CDE
Price
$21.13
Change
-$1.08 (-4.86%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
21.72B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAAS
Price
$52.87
Change
-$2.02 (-3.68%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
22B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CDE vs PAAS

CDE vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 10, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coeur Mining (CDE) vs. Pan American Silver (PAAS) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CDE and PAAS are both mid-to-large precious metals producers with primary exposure to silver and gold prices, making their performance highly correlated with commodity trends.
  • Recent market activity shows both stocks benefiting from elevated precious metals prices, though CDE reported record quarterly revenue alongside a new dividend policy and share repurchase program.
  • PAAS maintains a larger production scale and stronger balance sheet position, supported by record cash balances from prior quarters.
  • Sector sentiment remains tied to macroeconomic factors including interest rates, inflation expectations, and industrial demand for silver.
  • Relative performance in recent weeks reflects similar upward momentum driven by metal price rallies, with differences in operational catalysts and capital return strategies.
  • Both companies operate in the Americas, exposing them to comparable geopolitical, regulatory, and cost pressures in mining jurisdictions.

Introduction

This comparison examines CDE (Coeur Mining) and PAAS (Pan American Silver), two established players in the silver and gold mining sector. Investors and traders focused on precious metals exposure often evaluate these names together due to overlapping commodity sensitivities and operational footprints across North and South America. The analysis highlights differences in scale, recent operational updates, balance sheet strength, and market positioning within the current environment of fluctuating metal prices and shifting macroeconomic conditions. This review is relevant for portfolio managers seeking commodity-linked equities, sector specialists monitoring relative value, and active traders assessing momentum in basic materials.

Coeur Mining (CDE) Overview and Recent Performance

Coeur Mining, Inc. is a precious metals producer with operations focused on gold and silver extraction in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. The company has emphasized expansion through acquisitions and operational improvements in recent periods. In recent market activity, CDE shares responded positively to reported record quarterly revenue exceeding $1.1 billion, alongside the introduction of a dividend policy and a share repurchase authorization. These developments occurred amid higher realized metal prices and production metrics that included strong gold and silver output. Sentiment has been influenced by execution on ramp-ups at newer assets, cost management, and broader strength in gold prices, contributing to volatility and upward price movement in recent weeks.

Pan American Silver (PAAS) Overview and Recent Performance

Pan American Silver Corp. is one of the larger primary silver producers, with diversified operations across the Americas generating both silver and gold. The company maintains significant reserves and has pursued growth through acquisitions and optimization of existing mines. In recent market activity, PAAS benefited from rising silver prices and prior-quarter results that delivered record cash balances and enhanced shareholder return frameworks. Upcoming second-quarter results are anticipated shortly, following a period of steady production aligned with guidance. Performance has reflected commodity price support, operational consistency, and liquidity strength, with share price movements tracking broader sector gains in recent weeks.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only those demonstrating the strongest suitability for prevailing market conditions, including trend consistency and risk-adjusted metrics, earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of statistics, such as win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles, allowing users to match styles to individual preferences. The platform provides transparent performance data to support informed selection. Explore the full curated list at Trending AI Robots.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CDE and PAAS share core exposure to silver and gold prices but differ in scale and capital allocation. PAAS operates with larger attributable production volumes and a more established balance sheet featuring substantial cash reserves, supporting greater financial flexibility. In contrast, CDE has highlighted recent catalysts including record revenue, a first dividend in decades, and repurchase initiatives that may appeal to income-oriented or value-focused participants. Both face similar risks from commodity volatility, mining costs, and jurisdictional factors in the Americas. Recent momentum for each has aligned with metal price rallies, though CDE exhibited sharper reactions to its earnings release while PAAS emphasized liquidity and production stability. Market sentiment for the pair remains closely linked, with relative outperformance often determined by company-specific operational updates versus broader macro drivers.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as recent earnings delivery, capital return signals, and trend consistency amid commodity strength, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to CDE. This assessment reflects the stock’s response to record revenue figures and new shareholder return measures, which may support more sustained momentum relative to peers in the near term, though outcomes remain contingent on continued metal price stability and operational execution.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CDE vs. PAAS commentary
Aug 30, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CDE is a Hold and PAAS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2026
Stock price -- (CDE: $21.13 vs. PAAS: $52.87)
Brand notoriety: CDE: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CDE: 66% vs. PAAS: 160%
Market capitalization -- CDE: $21.72B vs. PAAS: $22B
CDE [@Precious Metals] is valued at $21.72B. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.85B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $14.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CDE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CDE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than CDE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CDE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CDE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CDE and PAAS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CDE (@Precious Metals) experienced а +0.76% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +34.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -22.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CDE is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.41% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($22B) and CDE($21.7B) have the same market capitalization . CDE has higher P/E ratio than PAAS: CDE (17.76) vs PAAS (15.64). CDE YTD gains are higher at: 18.641 vs. PAAS (3.006). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.46B vs. CDE (1.31B). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 1.37B vs. CDE (843M). CDE has less debt than PAAS: CDE (773M) vs PAAS (845M). PAAS has higher revenues than CDE: PAAS (4.31B) vs CDE (2.57B).
CDEPAASCDE / PAAS
Capitalization21.7B22B99%
EBITDA1.31B2.46B53%
Gain YTD18.6413.006620%
P/E Ratio17.7615.64114%
Revenue2.57B4.31B60%
Total Cash843M1.37B61%
Total Debt773M845M91%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CDE vs PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
CDE
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3846
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4546
SMR RATING
1..100
6344
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3843
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9082
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (18) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CDE (53). This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CDE’s over the last 12 months.

CDE's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (46). This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (44) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CDE (63). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.

CDE's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PAAS (43). This means that CDE’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as CDE (90). This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to CDE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CDEPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CDE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMBO2.120.03
+1.44%
Ambow Education Holding Ltd
OFRM17.160.18
+1.06%
Once Upon a Farm, PBC
CHAR10.94-0.01
-0.09%
Charlton Aria Acquisition Corporation
KOF112.58-0.43
-0.38%
Coca-Cola FEMSA SAB DE CV
VCYT43.34-1.91
-4.22%
Veracyte

CDE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDE has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CDE jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDE
1D Price
Change %
CDE100%
-4.86%
PAAS - CDE
84%
Closely correlated
-3.68%
FSM - CDE
82%
Closely correlated
-4.29%
IAG - CDE
81%
Closely correlated
-4.41%
KGC - CDE
80%
Closely correlated
-3.81%
AEM - CDE
80%
Closely correlated
-4.27%
More

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
-3.68%
WPM - PAAS
90%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
FSM - PAAS
88%
Closely correlated
-4.29%
KGC - PAAS
88%
Closely correlated
-3.81%
AEM - PAAS
87%
Closely correlated
-4.27%
IAG - PAAS
87%
Closely correlated
-4.41%
More