AEM
Price
$77.75
Change
-$3.98 (-4.87%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
56 days until earnings call
DGDCF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

AEM vs DGDCF

Header iconAEM vs DGDCF Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs DGDCFBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$77.75
Change-$3.98 (-4.87%)
Volume$13.54K
CapitalizationN/A
Dynasty Gold
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$5.8K
CapitalizationN/A
AEM vs DGDCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. DGDCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Buy and DGDCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AEM: $77.76 vs. DGDCF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: AEM and DGDCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 124% vs. DGDCF: 44%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $29.62B vs. DGDCF: $15.2M
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $29.62B. DGDCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDGDCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DGDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the long-term than DGDCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DGDCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DGDCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AEM and DGDCF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -10.98% price change this week, while DGDCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +13.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($29.6B) has a higher market cap than DGDCF($15.2M). AEM YTD gains are higher at: 52.610 vs. DGDCF (-31.357). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.94B vs. DGDCF (-326.02K). AEM has more cash in the bank: 349M vs. DGDCF (955K). AEM has higher revenues than DGDCF: AEM (6.63B) vs DGDCF (0).
AEMDGDCFAEM / DGDCF
Capitalization29.6B15.2M194,737%
EBITDA3.94B-326.02K-1,209,136%
Gain YTD52.610-31.357-168%
P/E Ratio15.52N/A-
Revenue6.63B0-
Total Cash349M955K36,545%
Total Debt2.01BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs DGDCF: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
DGDCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7323
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4577
SMR RATING
1..100
8291
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4290
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DGDCF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (96). This means that DGDCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (77). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as DGDCF (91). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DGDCF (90). This means that AEM’s stock grew somewhat faster than DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for DGDCF (100). This means that AEM’s stock grew significantly faster than DGDCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMDGDCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
74%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DGDCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USDNZD1.73N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - New Zealand Dollar
HKDGBP0.10N/A
N/A
Hong Kong Dollar - United Kingdom Pound
PGVFX32.20-0.24
-0.74%
Polaris Global Value
JVSAX16.23-0.23
-1.40%
Janus Henderson Small-Mid Cap Value A
LOVLX34.56-3.37
-8.89%
Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock F3

AEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEM has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AEM jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEM
1D Price
Change %
AEM100%
-1.10%
KGC - AEM
85%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
GOLD - AEM
85%
Closely correlated
-0.67%
AGI - AEM
85%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
WPM - AEM
83%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
PAAS - AEM
81%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
More

DGDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DGDCF and GSHRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DGDCF and GSHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DGDCF
1D Price
Change %
DGDCF100%
+28.13%
GSHRF - DGDCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
AEM - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.10%
GOLD - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
AGI - DGDCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
ABNAF - DGDCF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More