AEM
Price
$166.93
Change
+$3.51 (+2.15%)
Updated
Sep 29, 04:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
82.09B
30 days until earnings call
LUGDF
Price
$63.57
Change
+$1.19 (+1.91%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
15.37B
38 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs LUGDF

Header iconAEM vs LUGDF Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs LUGDFBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$166.93
Change+$3.51 (+2.15%)
Volume$10.32K
Capitalization82.09B
Lundin Gold
Price$63.57
Change+$1.19 (+1.91%)
Volume$38.51K
Capitalization15.37B
AEM vs LUGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. LUGDF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Buy and LUGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (AEM: $163.42 vs. LUGDF: $63.57)
Brand notoriety: AEM and LUGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 89% vs. LUGDF: 41%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $82.09B vs. LUGDF: $15.37B
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $82.09B. LUGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $15.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLUGDF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than AEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUGDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the short-term than LUGDF.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.38% price change this week, while LUGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6147.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.28% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($82.1B) has a higher market cap than LUGDF($15.4B). AEM has higher P/E ratio than LUGDF: AEM (27.79) vs LUGDF (25.03). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 210.627 vs. AEM (111.131). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.07B vs. LUGDF (1.03B). AEM has more cash in the bank: 1.57B vs. LUGDF (83M). LUGDF has less debt than AEM: LUGDF (298M) vs AEM (734M). AEM has higher revenues than LUGDF: AEM (9.66B) vs LUGDF (1.47B).
AEMLUGDFAEM / LUGDF
Capitalization82.1B15.4B533%
EBITDA6.07B1.03B589%
Gain YTD111.131210.62753%
P/E Ratio27.7925.03111%
Revenue9.66B1.47B656%
Total Cash1.57B83M1,890%
Total Debt734M298M246%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs LUGDF: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
LUGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
192
SMR RATING
1..100
5719
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3836
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9740
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (96). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (19). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (57). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (38). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (97). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMLUGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPTM80.160.49
+0.62%
SPDR® Port S&P 1500 Comps Stk Mkt ETF
IDVZ30.420.15
+0.50%
Opal International Div Inc ETF
ISWN21.120.08
+0.38%
Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF
JIG74.350.17
+0.22%
JPMorgan International Growth ETF
CARY20.99N/A
N/A
Angel Oak Income ETF

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
+1.91%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+4.24%
TORXF - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+2.82%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
AGI - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.61%
More