AEM
Price
$151.85
Change
+$3.46 (+2.33%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
76.51B
52 days until earnings call
LUGDF
Price
$67.70
Change
+$1.71 (+2.59%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
16.38B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEM vs LUGDF

Header iconAEM vs LUGDF Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs LUGDFBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$151.85
Change+$3.46 (+2.33%)
Volume$3.1M
Capitalization76.51B
Lundin Gold
Price$67.70
Change+$1.71 (+2.59%)
Volume$74.26K
Capitalization16.38B
AEM vs LUGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. LUGDF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a StrongBuy and LUGDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AEM: $151.85 vs. LUGDF: $67.70)
Brand notoriety: AEM and LUGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 127% vs. LUGDF: 82%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $76.51B vs. LUGDF: $16.38B
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $76.51B. LUGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $16.38B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLUGDF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than AEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUGDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AEM and LUGDF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а +5.62% price change this week, while LUGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was +9.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4920.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($76.5B) has a higher market cap than LUGDF($16.4B). LUGDF (26.65) and AEM (25.82) have similar P/E ratio . LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 226.949 vs. AEM (96.183). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.07B vs. LUGDF (1.03B). LUGDF has less debt than AEM: LUGDF (298M) vs AEM (734M). AEM has higher revenues than LUGDF: AEM (9.66B) vs LUGDF (1.47B).
AEMLUGDFAEM / LUGDF
Capitalization76.5B16.4B466%
EBITDA6.07B1.03B589%
Gain YTD96.183226.94942%
P/E Ratio25.8226.6597%
Revenue9.66B1.47B656%
Total CashN/A493M-
Total Debt734M298M246%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs LUGDF: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
LUGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
222
SMR RATING
1..100
5619
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3835
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9726
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (96). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (22). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (56). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (38). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (97). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMLUGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNDE34.650.37
+1.08%
Schwab Fundamental Emerging MarketsEqETF
TAXE50.270.26
+0.53%
T. Rowe Price Intermediate Muncpl IncETF
MBS8.700.03
+0.40%
Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
IIGD24.930.05
+0.22%
Invesco Investment Grade Defensive ETF
SCHJ24.940.04
+0.16%
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
+2.60%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+3.04%
TORXF - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+2.89%
AGI - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.03%
More