AEM
Price
$119.63
Change
+$1.39 (+1.18%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
29.62B
96 days until earnings call
LUGDF
Price
$41.00
Change
+$0.10 (+0.24%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
3.16B
13 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AEM vs LUGDF

Header iconAEM vs LUGDF Comparison
Open Charts AEM vs LUGDFBanner chart's image
Agnico Eagle Mines
Price$119.63
Change+$1.39 (+1.18%)
Volume$3.37M
Capitalization29.62B
Lundin Gold
Price$41.00
Change+$0.10 (+0.24%)
Volume$151.47K
Capitalization3.16B
AEM vs LUGDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEM vs. LUGDF commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEM is a Buy and LUGDF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (AEM: $119.63 vs. LUGDF: $41.00)
Brand notoriety: AEM and LUGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEM: 95% vs. LUGDF: 84%
Market capitalization -- AEM: $29.62B vs. LUGDF: $3.16B
AEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $29.62B. LUGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLUGDF’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • AEM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LUGDF’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, LUGDF is a better buy in the long-term than AEM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LUGDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LUGDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AEM is a better buy in the short-term than LUGDF.

Price Growth

AEM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.56% price change this week, while LUGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.37%.

Reported Earning Dates

AEM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

LUGDF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEM($29.6B) has a higher market cap than LUGDF($3.16B). LUGDF has higher P/E ratio than AEM: LUGDF (30.67) vs AEM (15.52). LUGDF YTD gains are higher at: 94.451 vs. AEM (53.606). AEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.94B vs. LUGDF (387M). AEM has more cash in the bank: 349M vs. LUGDF (210M). LUGDF has less debt than AEM: LUGDF (430M) vs AEM (2.01B). AEM has higher revenues than LUGDF: AEM (6.63B) vs LUGDF (856M).
AEMLUGDFAEM / LUGDF
Capitalization29.6B3.16B936%
EBITDA3.94B387M1,019%
Gain YTD53.60694.45157%
P/E Ratio15.5230.6751%
Revenue6.63B856M774%
Total Cash349M210M166%
Total Debt2.01B430M466%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEM vs LUGDF: Fundamental Ratings
AEM
LUGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2730
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
151
SMR RATING
1..100
7125
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3735
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
821
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LUGDF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEM (97). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew significantly faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (15). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEM (71). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEM’s over the last 12 months.

LUGDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as AEM (37). This means that LUGDF’s stock grew similarly to AEM’s over the last 12 months.

AEM's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as LUGDF (21). This means that AEM’s stock grew similarly to LUGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMLUGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AEM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LUGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SST0.330.01
+4.41%
System1
ESGL2.080.04
+1.95%
ESGL Holdings Limited
AMCR9.660.14
+1.47%
Amcor plc
NYMT5.590.04
+0.72%
New York Mortgage Trust
PTGX44.85-1.31
-2.84%
Protagonist Therapeutics

AEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AEM has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AEM jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEM
1D Price
Change %
AEM100%
+1.18%
WPM - AEM
91%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
AGI - AEM
88%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
GOLD - AEM
86%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
KGC - AEM
84%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
RGLD - AEM
84%
Closely correlated
+1.68%
More

LUGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LUGDF has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LUGDF jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LUGDF
1D Price
Change %
LUGDF100%
+0.24%
AEM - LUGDF
70%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
PAAS - LUGDF
68%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
TORXF - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
-1.47%
KGC - LUGDF
66%
Closely correlated
+2.23%
GOLD - LUGDF
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.84%
More