AEMD
Price
$1.14
Change
-$0.03 (-2.56%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.29M
GNGBY
Price
$21.39
Change
+$0.55 (+2.64%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.76B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AEMD vs GNGBY

Header iconAEMD vs GNGBY Comparison
Open Charts AEMD vs GNGBYBanner chart's image
Aethlon Medical
Price$1.14
Change-$0.03 (-2.56%)
Volume$48.54K
Capitalization2.29M
Getinge AB
Price$21.39
Change+$0.55 (+2.64%)
Volume$458
Capitalization5.76B
AEMD vs GNGBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AEMD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AEMD vs. GNGBY commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEMD is a Hold and GNGBY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (AEMD: $1.14 vs. GNGBY: $21.39)
Brand notoriety: AEMD and GNGBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AEMD: 14% vs. GNGBY: 9%
Market capitalization -- AEMD: $2.29M vs. GNGBY: $5.76B
AEMD [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $2.29M. GNGBY’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $5.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $229.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AEMD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGNGBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AEMD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GNGBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GNGBY is a better buy in the long-term than AEMD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AEMD’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNGBY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AEMD’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GNGBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GNGBY is a better buy in the short-term than AEMD.

Price Growth

AEMD (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -7.32% price change this week, while GNGBY (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +3.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +1.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+1.37% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNGBY($5.76B) has a higher market cap than AEMD($2.29M). GNGBY YTD gains are higher at: 40.757 vs. AEMD (-83.430). GNGBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.51B vs. AEMD (-9.48M). GNGBY has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. AEMD (706K). AEMD has less debt than GNGBY: AEMD (725K) vs GNGBY (11.2B). GNGBY has higher revenues than AEMD: GNGBY (35.5B) vs AEMD (0).
AEMDGNGBYAEMD / GNGBY
Capitalization2.29M5.76B0%
EBITDA-9.48M5.51B-0%
Gain YTD-83.43040.757-205%
P/E RatioN/A37.38-
Revenue035.5B-
Total Cash706K1.95B0%
Total Debt725K11.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AEMD vs GNGBY: Fundamental Ratings
AEMD
GNGBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10094
SMR RATING
1..100
9983
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9547
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10011
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GNGBY's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as AEMD (26) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew similarly to AEMD’s over the last 12 months.

GNGBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as AEMD (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew similarly to AEMD’s over the last 12 months.

GNGBY's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as AEMD (99) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew similarly to AEMD’s over the last 12 months.

GNGBY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AEMD (95) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AEMD’s over the last 12 months.

GNGBY's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AEMD (100) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that GNGBY’s stock grew significantly faster than AEMD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AEMDGNGBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AEMD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GNGBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VINIX526.35N/A
N/A
Vanguard Institutional Index I
MFWGX17.82N/A
N/A
MFS Global Total Return R1
LICTX17.98N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Equity R5
JHJIX24.31N/A
N/A
JHancock ESG Large Cap Core I
FUMIX19.16N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI US Momentum Index

AEMD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AEMD and ISPC have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AEMD and ISPC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AEMD
1D Price
Change %
AEMD100%
-2.56%
ISPC - AEMD
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
GNGBY - AEMD
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.61%
IDXX - AEMD
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
CSTL - AEMD
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
HSDT - AEMD
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.17%
More

GNGBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNGBY and CNMD have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNGBY and CNMD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNGBY
1D Price
Change %
GNGBY100%
+2.61%
CNMD - GNGBY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.91%
ALGN - GNGBY
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
AVNS - GNGBY
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.19%
SNN - GNGBY
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
AEMD - GNGBY
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.56%
More