Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEMRX vs RNWBX
AEMRX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts AEMRX vs RNWBX
American Century Emerging Markets R
Price$13.87
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.71B
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.88
Change+$0.26 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.51B
AEMRX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEMRX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEMRX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.5B vs. AEMRX (1.71B). AEMRX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: AEMRX (0.16) vs RNWBX (0.12). AEMRX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: AEMRX (18 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). AEMRX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). RNWBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. AEMRX (29.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEMRX: RNWBX (250) vs AEMRX (2500). AEMRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.02 vs. RNWBX (14.08). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.45 vs. AEMRX (14.37).
| AEMRX | RNWBX | AEMRX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.67 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.67 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.717 | 23.562 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.71B | 74.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.12 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.02 | 14.08 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.58 | 55.31 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.37 | 24.45 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.09 | 85.42 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement