Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FCIWX
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$59.50
Change+$0.35 (+0.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.65B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.26
Change+$0.14 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets830.6M
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FCIWX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FCIWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FCIWX (831M). FCIWX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FCIWX (0.66) vs AEPCX (0.17). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FCIWX (0.89). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FCIWX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.74 vs. FCIWX (2.37). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 39.87 vs. AEPCX (8.49).
| AEPCX | FCIWX | AEPCX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.80 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.89 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.154 | 5.955 | 254% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 831M | 16,366% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.66 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.74 | 2.37 | 369% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.66 | 29.31 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.49 | 39.87 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement