Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FCIWX
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$59.44
Change+$0.30 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.86B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.24
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets770.26M
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FCIWX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FCIWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FCIWX (770M). FCIWX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FCIWX (0.64) vs AEPCX (0.16). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: AEPCX (25 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FCIWX (0.89). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FCIWX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.59 vs. FCIWX (0.30). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 39.92 vs. AEPCX (7.78).
| AEPCX | FCIWX | AEPCX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.80 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.89 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.038 | 5.832 | 258% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 770M | 17,273% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.64 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 0.30 | 2,518% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.65 | 43.42 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.78 | 39.92 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement