Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs FCIWX
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FCIWX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$57.52
Change+$0.64 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.03B
NYLI PineStone International Eq Cl R6
Price$17.38
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets866.13M
AEPCX vs FCIWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FCIWX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and FCIWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FCIWX (866M). FCIWX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FCIWX (0.64) vs AEPCX (0.32). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FCIWX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FCIWX (8 years). AEPCX (1.57) is less costly to investors than FCIWX (0.89). AEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FCIWX (10.00). FCIWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FCIWX (0) vs AEPCX (250). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.57 vs. FCIWX (1.94). FCIWX return over 5 years is better than : 54.77 vs. AEPCX (14.58).
| AEPCX | FCIWX | AEPCX / FCIWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.80 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.89 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.322 | 6.691 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 866M | 15,358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.64 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 1.94 | 235% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.13 | 39.27 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.58 | 54.77 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement