Ad is loading...
AEPCX vs FOSFX
AEPCX vs FOSFX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs FOSFX
American Funds Europacific Growth C
Price$53.43
Change+$0.63 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.11B
Fidelity Overseas
Price$68.62
Change+$0.80 (+1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.51B
AEPCX vs FOSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. FOSFX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and FOSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. FOSFX (6.51B). FOSFX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: FOSFX (1.30) vs AEPCX (0.35). AEPCX was incepted earlier than FOSFX: AEPCX (24 years) vs FOSFX (40 years). AEPCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than FOSFX (0.68). FOSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. AEPCX (30.00). FOSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: FOSFX (0) vs AEPCX (250). FOSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.30 vs. AEPCX (-5.13). FOSFX return over 5 years is better than : 60.39 vs. AEPCX (19.96).
| AEPCX | FOSFX | AEPCX / FOSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.68 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.68 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.871 | 7.492 | 12% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 123B | 6.51B | 1,889% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 1.30 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.13 | 8.30 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.33 | 24.75 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.96 | 60.39 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.92 | 62.67 | 8% |