Ad is loading...
AEPCX vs MNOSX
AEPCX vs MNOSX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs MNOSX
American Funds Europacific Growth C
Price$50.61
Change+$0.85 (+1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.48B
Manning & Napier Overseas Series S
Price$32.68
Change+$0.85 (+2.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.61M
AEPCX vs MNOSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. MNOSX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and MNOSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 116B vs. MNOSX (324M). MNOSX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: MNOSX (0.97) vs AEPCX (0.35). AEPCX was incepted earlier than MNOSX: AEPCX (24 years) vs MNOSX (7 years). AEPCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than MNOSX (1.14). MNOSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. AEPCX (30.00). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNOSX: AEPCX (250) vs MNOSX (2000). MNOSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.00 vs. AEPCX (-9.35). MNOSX return over 5 years is better than : 55.26 vs. AEPCX (17.79).
| AEPCX | MNOSX | AEPCX / MNOSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.06 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.14 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.051 | -1.057 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116B | 324M | 35,802% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.97 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.35 | 1.00 | -933% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.08 | 5.43 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.79 | 55.26 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...