Ad is loading...
AEPCX vs NBNCX
AEPCX vs NBNCX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NBNCX
American Funds Europacific Growth C
Price$50.61
Change+$0.85 (+1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.48B
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$12.93
Change+$0.34 (+2.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets183.57M
AEPCX vs NBNCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NBNCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and NBNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 116B vs. NBNCX (184M). AEPCX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: AEPCX (0.35) vs NBNCX (0.07). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NBNCX: AEPCX (24 years) vs NBNCX (17 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than AEPCX (1.59). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEPCX (30.00). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: AEPCX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). NBNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.26 vs. AEPCX (-9.35). NBNCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.81 vs. AEPCX (17.79).
| AEPCX | NBNCX | AEPCX / NBNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.91 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 2.13 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.051 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 116B | 184M | 63,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.07 | 494% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.35 | -2.26 | 415% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.08 | -0.72 | 426% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.79 | 18.81 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.51 | 12.37 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...