Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs NBNCX
AEPCX vs NBNCX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NBNCX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$62.33
Change-$0.26 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.70
Change-$0.07 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.01M
AEPCX vs NBNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NBNCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and NBNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. NBNCX (248M). AEPCX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: AEPCX (0.16) vs NBNCX (0.06). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NBNCX: AEPCX (25 years) vs NBNCX (18 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than AEPCX (1.57). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: AEPCX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.48 vs. NBNCX (7.81). AEPCX return over 5 years is better than : 10.38 vs. NBNCX (9.73).
| AEPCX | NBNCX | AEPCX / NBNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 2.13 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.134 | 17.315 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 248M | 55,645% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.06 | 242% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.48 | 7.81 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.46 | 41.44 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.38 | 9.73 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.33 | 42.27 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement