Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs NBNCX
AEPCX vs NBNCX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NBNCX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$60.86
Change-$0.25 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.22B
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.16
Change-$0.06 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.67M
AEPCX vs NBNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NBNCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and NBNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. NBNCX (236M). AEPCX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: AEPCX (0.15) vs NBNCX (0.06). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NBNCX: AEPCX (25 years) vs NBNCX (18 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than AEPCX (1.57). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: AEPCX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.92 vs. NBNCX (9.38). NBNCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.70 vs. AEPCX (0.06).
| AEPCX | NBNCX | AEPCX / NBNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 2.13 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.786 | 12.947 | 137% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132B | 236M | 55,932% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.15 | 0.06 | 237% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.92 | 9.38 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.65 | 22.99 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.06 | 0.70 | 9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.96 | 35.31 | 93% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement