Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs NBNCX
AEPCX vs NBNCX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NBNCX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$59.44
Change+$0.30 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.86B
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.62
Change+$0.06 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.32M
AEPCX vs NBNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NBNCX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and NBNCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. NBNCX (245M). AEPCX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: AEPCX (0.16) vs NBNCX (0.06). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NBNCX: AEPCX (24 years) vs NBNCX (18 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than AEPCX (1.57). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: AEPCX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.59 vs. NBNCX (6.41). NBNCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.31 vs. AEPCX (7.78).
| AEPCX | NBNCX | AEPCX / NBNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 2.13 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.038 | 16.124 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 245M | 54,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.06 | 251% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.59 | 6.41 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.65 | 34.52 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.78 | 11.31 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.34 | 44.36 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement