Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs NBNCX
AEPCX vs NBNCX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NBNCX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$59.33
Change-$0.17 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.65B
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.77
Change-$0.05 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.52M
AEPCX vs NBNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NBNCX commentary
Aug 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and NBNCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. NBNCX (249M). AEPCX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: AEPCX (0.17) vs NBNCX (0.07). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NBNCX: AEPCX (24 years) vs NBNCX (18 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than AEPCX (1.57). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: AEPCX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). NBNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.70 vs. AEPCX (8.15). NBNCX return over 5 years is better than : 11.99 vs. AEPCX (8.18).
| AEPCX | NBNCX | AEPCX / NBNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 2.13 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.825 | 17.712 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 249M | 54,618% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.17 | 0.07 | 255% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 9.70 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.77 | 23.62 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.18 | 11.99 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.60 | 37.68 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers