Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPCX vs NBNCX
AEPCX vs NBNCX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NBNCX
American Funds EUPAC C
Price$60.84
Change-$0.50 (-0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.46B
Neuberger Berman International Sel C
Price$14.41
Change-$0.22 (-1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.08M
AEPCX vs NBNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NBNCX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and NBNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. NBNCX (246M). AEPCX pays higher dividends than NBNCX: AEPCX (0.16) vs NBNCX (0.06). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NBNCX: AEPCX (25 years) vs NBNCX (18 years). NBNCX (2.13) is less costly to investors than AEPCX (1.57). NBNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEPCX (35.00). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBNCX: AEPCX (250) vs NBNCX (1000). AEPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.64 vs. NBNCX (5.63). NBNCX return over 5 years is better than : 13.00 vs. AEPCX (12.10).
| AEPCX | NBNCX | AEPCX / NBNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 1.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 2.13 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.747 | 16.203 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 136B | 246M | 55,285% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.06 | 251% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.64 | 5.63 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.27 | 46.06 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.10 | 13.00 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.84 | 50.28 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement