Ad is loading...
AEPCX vs NBNRX
AEPCX vs NBNRX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NBNRX
American Funds Europacific Growth C
Price$50.61
Change+$0.85 (+1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.41B
Neuberger Berman International Sel R3
Price$13.14
Change+$0.35 (+2.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets188.62M
AEPCX vs NBNRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NBNRX commentary
Apr 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Hold and NBNRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. NBNRX (189M). NBNRX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: NBNRX (0.71) vs AEPCX (0.35). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NBNRX: AEPCX (24 years) vs NBNRX (16 years). NBNRX (1.61) and AEPCX (1.59) have similar cost to investors . NBNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEPCX (30.00). NBNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPCX: NBNRX (0) vs AEPCX (250). NBNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.89 vs. AEPCX (-9.35). NBNRX return over 5 years is better than : 25.47 vs. AEPCX (17.79).
| AEPCX | NBNRX | AEPCX / NBNRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.41 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.61 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.051 | 2.817 | -73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 189M | 62,434% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.71 | 49% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.35 | 0.89 | -1,048% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.08 | 3.56 | -87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.79 | 25.47 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.51 | 20.32 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...