Ad is loading...
AEPCX vs NILTX
AEPCX vs NILTX Comparison
Open Charts AEPCX vs NILTX
American Funds Europacific Growth C
Price$55.53
Change+$0.28 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.09B
Neuberger Berman International Sel Tr
Price$14.74
Change+$0.14 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets212.4M
AEPCX vs NILTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPCX vs. NILTX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPCX is a Buy and NILTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPCX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. NILTX (212M). NILTX pays higher dividends than AEPCX: NILTX (0.84) vs AEPCX (0.34). AEPCX was incepted earlier than NILTX: AEPCX (24 years) vs NILTX (19 years). AEPCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than NILTX (1.38). NILTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. AEPCX (30.00). AEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NILTX: AEPCX (250) vs NILTX (1000). NILTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.85 vs. AEPCX (-1.26). NILTX return over 5 years is better than : 32.16 vs. AEPCX (22.29).
| AEPCX | NILTX | AEPCX / NILTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.15 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.38 | 115% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.470 | 11.706 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 212M | 60,377% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.84 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.26 | 7.85 | -16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.29 | 24.45 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.29 | 32.16 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.31 | 34.27 | 39% |