Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPFX vs CCWSX
AEPFX vs CCWSX Comparison
Open Charts AEPFX vs CCWSX
American Funds EUPAC F2
Price$63.80
Change+$0.20 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.4B
Baird Chautauqua International Gr I
Price$22.05
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
AEPFX vs CCWSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPFX vs. CCWSX commentary
Sep 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPFX is a Buy and CCWSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. CCWSX (1.5B). AEPFX pays higher dividends than CCWSX: AEPFX (0.85) vs CCWSX (0.39). AEPFX was incepted earlier than CCWSX: AEPFX (17 years) vs CCWSX (9 years). CCWSX (1.09) is less costly to investors than AEPFX (0.58). AEPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. CCWSX (18.00). AEPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCWSX: AEPFX (250) vs CCWSX (2500). CCWSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.40 vs. AEPFX (5.94). CCWSX return over 5 years is better than : 54.17 vs. AEPFX (19.62).
| AEPFX | CCWSX | AEPFX / CCWSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.05 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.09 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.119 | 17.600 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 1.5B | 9,018% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.39 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.94 | 11.40 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.86 | 65.06 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.62 | 54.17 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement