Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPFX vs HNCCX
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEPFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F2
Price$63.89
Change-$0.13 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.84B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$18.64
Change-$0.04 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets356.66M
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPFX is a Hold and HNCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPFX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. HNCCX (357M). AEPFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEPFX (0.85) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEPFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEPFX (17 years) vs HNCCX (24 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEPFX (0.58). AEPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). AEPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEPFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.81 vs. AEPFX (10.45). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 24.20 vs. AEPFX (17.02).
| AEPFX | HNCCX | AEPFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.05 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.14 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.287 | 23.300 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 357M | 38,375% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.45 | 22.81 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.10 | 67.83 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.02 | 24.20 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.78 | 69.00 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers