Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPFX vs HNCCX
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEPFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F2
Price$62.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.64B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$18.02
Change+$0.12 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.67M
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPFX is a Hold and HNCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. HNCCX (339M). AEPFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEPFX (0.88) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEPFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEPFX (17 years) vs HNCCX (24 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEPFX (0.58). AEPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). AEPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEPFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.52 vs. AEPFX (6.39). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 18.39 vs. AEPFX (12.35).
| AEPFX | HNCCX | AEPFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.05 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.14 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.057 | 18.152 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 339M | 39,823% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.39 | 14.52 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.71 | 53.52 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.35 | 18.39 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.04 | 62.24 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement