Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPFX vs HNCCX
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEPFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F2
Price$60.63
Change+$0.13 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.48B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$17.85
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets334.17M
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPFX is a Buy and HNCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. HNCCX (334M). AEPFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEPFX (0.87) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEPFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEPFX (17 years) vs HNCCX (24 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEPFX (0.58). AEPFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. HNCCX (31.00). AEPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEPFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.61 vs. AEPFX (5.52). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.54 vs. AEPFX (20.04).
| AEPFX | HNCCX | AEPFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.05 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.14 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.200 | 17.822 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 334M | 40,120% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.52 | 15.61 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.27 | 56.72 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.04 | 29.54 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.44 | 50.89 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement