Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPFX vs HNCCX
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison
Open Charts AEPFX vs HNCCX
American Funds EUPAC F2
Price$60.54
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.44B
Hartford International Growth C
Price$17.25
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.02M
AEPFX vs HNCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPFX vs. HNCCX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPFX is a Buy and HNCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPFX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. HNCCX (325M). AEPFX pays higher dividends than HNCCX: AEPFX (1.27) vs HNCCX (0.00). AEPFX was incepted earlier than HNCCX: AEPFX (17 years) vs HNCCX (24 years). HNCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than AEPFX (0.57). HNCCX (31.00) and AEPFX (30.00) have comparable annual turnover. AEPFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HNCCX: AEPFX (250) vs HNCCX (2000). HNCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.80 vs. AEPFX (3.27). HNCCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.89 vs. AEPFX (21.40).
| AEPFX | HNCCX | AEPFX / HNCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.05 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 2.14 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.995 | 13.795 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 325M | 40,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.27 | 10.80 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.33 | 30.80 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.40 | 27.89 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.62 | 42.49 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement