Ad is loading...
AEPGX vs FCIUX
AEPGX vs FCIUX Comparison
Open Charts AEPGX vs FCIUX
American Funds Europacific Growth A
Price$55.67
Change+$0.64 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.11B
NYLI PineStone International Equity Cl I
Price$16.64
Change+$0.22 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets795.72M
AEPGX vs FCIUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPGX vs. FCIUX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPGX is a Buy and FCIUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPGX has more cash in the bank: 123B vs. FCIUX (796M). AEPGX pays higher dividends than FCIUX: AEPGX (1.11) vs FCIUX (0.63). AEPGX was incepted earlier than FCIUX: AEPGX (41 years) vs FCIUX (8 years). FCIUX (0.93) is less costly to investors than AEPGX (0.85). AEPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. FCIUX (12.00). AEPGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCIUX: AEPGX (250) vs FCIUX (1000000). FCIUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.40 vs. AEPGX (-1.92). FCIUX return over 5 years is better than : 64.59 vs. AEPGX (27.35).
| AEPGX | FCIUX | AEPGX / FCIUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.85 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.93 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.630 | 2.526 | 144% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 123B | 796M | 15,452% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 0.63 | 176% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.92 | 3.40 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.48 | 21.25 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.35 | 64.59 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.60 | N/A | - |