Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AEPGX vs FZABX
AEPGX vs FZABX Comparison
Open Charts AEPGX vs FZABX
American Funds EUPAC A
Price$62.20
Change+$0.33 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.86B
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Intl Z
Price$29.93
Change+$0.23 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.55B
AEPGX vs FZABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AEPGX vs. FZABX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AEPGX is a Hold and FZABX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AEPGX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FZABX (1.55B). FZABX pays higher dividends than AEPGX: FZABX (1.64) vs AEPGX (0.68). AEPGX was incepted earlier than FZABX: AEPGX (41 years) vs FZABX (12 years). AEPGX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FZABX (0.73). AEPGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FZABX (33.00). FZABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AEPGX: FZABX (0) vs AEPGX (250). FZABX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.16 vs. AEPGX (8.68). FZABX return over 5 years is better than : 20.60 vs. AEPGX (11.80).
| AEPGX | FZABX | AEPGX / FZABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.73 | 114% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.73 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.786 | 18.254 | 86% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 1.55B | 8,592% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 1.64 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | 9.16 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.42 | 44.12 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.80 | 20.60 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.20 | 59.26 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement