AETUF
Price
$17.02
Change
-$0.59 (-3.35%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
51 days until earnings call
CRLFF
Price
$4.36
Change
-$0.06 (-1.36%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

AETUF vs CRLFF

Header iconAETUF vs CRLFF Comparison
Open Charts AETUF vs CRLFFBanner chart's image
Arc Resources
Price$17.02
Change-$0.59 (-3.35%)
Volume$36.44K
CapitalizationN/A
Cardinal Energy
Price$4.36
Change-$0.06 (-1.36%)
Volume$55.58K
CapitalizationN/A
AETUF vs CRLFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AETUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AETUF vs. CRLFF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AETUF is a Hold and CRLFF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AETUF: $17.02 vs. CRLFF: $4.36)
Brand notoriety: AETUF and CRLFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AETUF: 164% vs. CRLFF: 151%
Market capitalization -- AETUF: $9.18B vs. CRLFF: $745.9M
AETUF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $9.18B. CRLFF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $745.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AETUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRLFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AETUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CRLFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AETUF is a better buy in the long-term than CRLFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AETUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRLFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AETUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • CRLFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AETUF is a better buy in the short-term than CRLFF.

Price Growth

AETUF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -3.03% price change this week, while CRLFF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -3.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +46.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

AETUF is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+46.66% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AETUF($9.19B) has a higher market cap than CRLFF($746M). CRLFF has higher P/E ratio than AETUF: CRLFF (5.06) vs AETUF (4.39). AETUF YTD gains are higher at: 14.290 vs. CRLFF (-8.246). AETUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.24B vs. CRLFF (318M). CRLFF has less debt than AETUF: CRLFF (49.1M) vs AETUF (1.93B). AETUF has higher revenues than CRLFF: AETUF (9.51B) vs CRLFF (601M).
AETUFCRLFFAETUF / CRLFF
Capitalization9.19B746M1,231%
EBITDA5.24B318M1,649%
Gain YTD14.290-8.246-173%
P/E Ratio4.395.0687%
Revenue9.51B601M1,582%
Total Cash4.4MN/A-
Total Debt1.93B49.1M3,929%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AETUF vs CRLFF: Fundamental Ratings
AETUF
CRLFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1069
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1738
SMR RATING
1..100
5264
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5373
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3910
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRLFF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AETUF (41). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AETUF’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (38). This means that AETUF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (64). This means that AETUF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

AETUF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CRLFF (73). This means that AETUF’s stock grew similarly to CRLFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRLFF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as AETUF (39). This means that CRLFF’s stock grew similarly to AETUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AETUFCRLFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AETUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRLFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LNNGY54.901.76
+3.31%
Li Ning Co., Ltd.
BRQSF0.280.01
+1.85%
Borqs Technologies, Inc.
KIGRY8.43-0.10
-1.17%
KION GROUP AG
NRDBY11.10-0.19
-1.68%
Nordea Bank Abp
ORRCF0.18N/A
-1.97%
Oroco Resource Corp.

AETUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AETUF has been closely correlated with TRMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AETUF jumps, then TRMLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AETUF
1D Price
Change %
AETUF100%
-3.36%
TRMLF - AETUF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
SPGYF - AETUF
71%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
BTE - AETUF
70%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
MEGEF - AETUF
69%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
CRLFF - AETUF
68%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
More

CRLFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRLFF has been closely correlated with ZPTAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRLFF jumps, then ZPTAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRLFF
1D Price
Change %
CRLFF100%
-1.44%
ZPTAF - CRLFF
76%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
VRN - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
BTE - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
SPGYF - CRLFF
74%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
TNEYF - CRLFF
73%
Closely correlated
-1.91%
More