AFBOF
Price
$9.47
Change
+$0.11 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.23B
SLGGF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
609.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFBOF vs SLGGF

Header iconAFBOF vs SLGGF Comparison
Open Charts AFBOF vs SLGGFBanner chart's image
African Rainbow Minerals
Price$9.47
Change+$0.11 (+1.18%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.23B
Solgold
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$94.24K
Capitalization609.45M
AFBOF vs SLGGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFBOF vs. SLGGF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFBOF is a Hold and SLGGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (AFBOF: $9.47 vs. SLGGF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: AFBOF and SLGGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFBOF: 16% vs. SLGGF: 78%
Market capitalization -- AFBOF: $2.23B vs. SLGGF: $609.45M
AFBOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.23B. SLGGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $609.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFBOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLGGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFBOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFBOF is a better buy in the long-term than SLGGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFBOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLGGF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFBOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SLGGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFBOF is a better buy in the short-term than SLGGF.

Price Growth

AFBOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLGGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFBOF($2.23B) has a higher market cap than SLGGF($609M). SLGGF YTD gains are higher at: 18.750 vs. AFBOF (16.196). AFBOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 18.3B vs. SLGGF (1.61M). AFBOF has more cash in the bank: 9.83B vs. SLGGF (48.1M). SLGGF has less debt than AFBOF: SLGGF (144M) vs AFBOF (289M). AFBOF has higher revenues than SLGGF: AFBOF (18.6B) vs SLGGF (0).
AFBOFSLGGFAFBOF / SLGGF
Capitalization2.23B609M366%
EBITDA18.3B1.61M1,136,646%
Gain YTD16.19618.75086%
P/E Ratio3.06N/A-
Revenue18.6B0-
Total Cash9.83B48.1M20,443%
Total Debt289M144M201%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFBOF vs SLGGF: Fundamental Ratings
AFBOF
SLGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5097
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72100
SMR RATING
1..100
1295
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFBOF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as SLGGF (33). This means that AFBOF’s stock grew similarly to SLGGF’s over the last 12 months.

AFBOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as SLGGF (100). This means that AFBOF’s stock grew similarly to SLGGF’s over the last 12 months.

AFBOF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLGGF (95). This means that AFBOF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLGGF’s over the last 12 months.

SLGGF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as AFBOF (53). This means that SLGGF’s stock grew similarly to AFBOF’s over the last 12 months.

AFBOF's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLGGF (100). This means that AFBOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLGGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFBOFSLGGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UIAGX74.560.99
+1.35%
Victory Aggressive Growth Institutional
MLNAX25.980.22
+0.85%
Morgan Stanley Instl Glbl Concntr A
BIRIX22.730.19
+0.84%
BlackRock Sustainable Adg Lg Cp Cr Instl
CAMSX16.980.12
+0.71%
Cambiar Small Cap Inv
MSDVX21.090.11
+0.52%
BlackRock Equity Dividend Svc

AFBOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFBOF has been loosely correlated with CAPFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFBOF jumps, then CAPFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFBOF
1D Price
Change %
AFBOF100%
N/A
CAPFF - AFBOF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GRRLF - AFBOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTRBF - AFBOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMXXF - AFBOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLGGF - AFBOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More

SLGGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLGGF and EMGDF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLGGF and EMGDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLGGF
1D Price
Change %
SLGGF100%
-0.31%
EMGDF - SLGGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
CTXDF - SLGGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.59%
USAS - SLGGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.01%
MGMNF - SLGGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
TMASF - SLGGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.15%
More